PLEnlist

The Battle of Anchialus, 917: Byzantium's bloody disaster

Byzantine Empire · 20 August 917 · Byzantines vs Bulgaria · ~7 min read · Updated October 2026

Next anniversary: 20 August 2027, the 1110th anniversary 20 August in history ›

Madrid Skylitzes miniature of Bulgarian horsemen of Simeon I routing the Byzantine army of Krenites and Kourtikios in 894

Madrid Skylitzes, Biblioteca Nacional de España, 12th century, via Wikimedia Commons, public domain.

At a glance

Byzantine EmpireLeo Phokas the Elder
vs
First Bulgarian EmpireTsar Simeon I
Date
20 August 917
Location
Near Anchialus, on the Black Sea coast
Period
Byzantine-Bulgarian Wars
Outcome
Decisive Bulgarian victory
By the numbers
SideStrengthLosses
Byzantine EmpireA large army drawn from the whole empire under Leo Phokas; size not recordedCatastrophic; most of the army destroyed in the rout, Constantine Lips and John Grapson among the dead
BulgariaSimeon's army; size not recordedUnknown; probably heaviest in the first phase

No Byzantine source gives numbers. Al-Masudi's 62,000 Byzantines against 60,000 Bulgarians may not even refer to this battle; Mirosław Leszka rejects them and estimates each army at roughly 15,000 to 25,000.1

Quick answer

Who won the Battle of Anchialus?

At the Battle of Anchialus, also called the Battle of the Achelous, on 20 August 917, Tsar Simeon I of Bulgaria destroyed a large Byzantine army led by Leo Phokas near the Black Sea coast. The Byzantine attack began well, but Simeon threw his reserves against its rear, and the retreat that followed became a rout and then a massacre. The empire suffered a total defeat, and the victory left Bulgaria, for a time, the dominant power of the Balkans.2

Writing late in the tenth century, generations after the battle, the Byzantine historian Leo the Deacon could still say that heaps of bones lay near Anchialus, where the army of the Romans had been cut down as it fled in disgrace. A powerful imperial army had marched out to crush Bulgaria once and for all. On a summer day by a small river on the Black Sea coast, it was itself destroyed.3

Byzantine miniature of an emperor and a tsar seated at a table in an arcaded palace while attendants stand by
The young emperor Constantine VII dines with Tsar Simeon of Bulgaria in 913, as John Skylitzes tells the story of Simeon's visit to Constantinople; a miniature from the Madrid Skylitzes. Public domain

Simeon, the half-Greek tsar

Simeon was born in the mid-860s, a younger son of Boris I, the khan who had made Bulgaria Christian. As a young man he was sent to Constantinople, where he studied Demosthenes and Aristotle and began a monastic life. In 893 Boris deposed Simeon's elder brother Vladimir, whose excesses, Miller writes, had endangered the state, and placed Simeon on the throne.4

He ruled a state at its height. His capital, Great Preslav, was in the words of his contemporary John the Exarch a marvel to behold, and Simeon had so many Greek books translated into Slavonic that his contemporaries likened him to the Ptolemies. In 913, Leszka writes, he reached for the title of basileus, emperor, raising his standing against the ruler in Constantinople.5

Large painting of a bearded ruler enthroned under a golden arch, raising his hand, surrounded by monks and scribes writing and reading among piles of manuscripts
The Bulgarian Tsar Simeon: The Morning Star of Slavonic Literature, painted by Alfons Mucha in 1923 for his Slav Epic: Simeon on his throne at Preslav among the scholars translating Greek books into Slavonic. Public domain. Alfons Mucha, oil on canvas, 1923, Prague City Gallery, via Wikimedia Commons.

The crown of 913

Simeon's first war with Byzantium, in the 890s, began over trade: two Greek merchants moved the Bulgarian market from Constantinople to Thessalonica and loaded it with duties. The emperor Leo VI called in the Magyars, who devastated Bulgaria, but Simeon struck back, beat a Greek army at Bulgarophygon near Adrianople and won a favorable peace.6

When the emperor Alexander refused to renew that peace and then died in 913, leaving the child Constantine VII on the throne, Simeon marched on Constantinople. Outside the walls the patriarch Nicholas Mystikos, head of the regency, met him and laid his own headcloth on Simeon's bowed head. Historians still argue whether this was a coronation, a recognition of his imperial title or merely a blessing; Leszka surveys several rival interpretations. A marriage between Constantine VII and a daughter of Simeon seems to have been agreed as well.7

Zoe's war

In February 914 the regency changed hands. The patriarch was pushed aside by the empress Zoe Karbonopsina, the child emperor's mother, and the deal of 913 was dead. That September Simeon took Adrianople, apparently in answer to the broken agreement, and the new regents resolved to destroy him.8

Peace on the eastern frontier allowed Constantinople to bring troops from all over the empire. Leo Phokas, domestic of the scholai, led the land army; Romanos Lekapenos, the drungarios of the fleet and a future emperor, was to sail to the Danube and ferry Pecheneg nomads across to attack Bulgaria from the north. The plan failed before the battle began: Romanos quarreled with the envoy John Bogas, Simeon had been courting the Pechenegs himself, and they never crossed.9

The armies

No Byzantine source gives the size of either army. The Arab writer al-Masudi tells of a battle in which 62,000 Byzantines met 60,000 Bulgarians, and some scholars have accepted his figures for Anchialus, but Leszka rejects them as worthless for both sides, noting that it is not even certain that al-Masudi is describing this campaign. Forces that large, he argues, do not seem to have been sent on real campaigns, and he estimates each army at roughly 15,000 to 25,000.10

The sources do name the Byzantine officers: John Grapson, commander of the excubitors; Olbianos Maroules of the hikanatoi; the magister Melias with his Armenians; Leo's brother Bardas Phokas; Romanos and Leo, sons of Argyros; and the patrician Constantine Lips, probably as an adviser to Leo. It was an army of the imperial elite.11

Dark locator map with a gold star in a glowing circle marking the approximate site of the Battle of Anchialus, the coasts, rivers and lakes of the region, and a small world map inset with the area boxed
The Battle of Anchialus: the star marks the approximate site, and the inset shows the area on a world map. Drawn for this article from Natural Earth data, with no modern borders. Location map: © Echoes of Battle (data: Natural Earth, public domain)

The battle by the Achelous

The armies met on 20 August 917 near the fortress of Anchialus on the Black Sea coast. John Skylitzes places the battle at a fortress called Achelous, which Leszka takes to be the small river Achelous that flows near Anchialus; hence the battle's two names. Simeon watched from a height overlooking the field. A letter of the patriarch Nicholas Mystikos mentions that the tsar's horse was killed, which has led some historians to think Simeon fought in person; Leszka suspects the horse fell when the Byzantines struck at his command post.12

What we know of the fighting suggests two phases. In the first, the Byzantine attack threw back the Bulgarian front line, and for a while it looked as if the empire would win the victory it had planned. Then Simeon threw his reserves against the rear of the Byzantine army. The blow caused confusion, the Byzantines began to fall back, and the main Bulgarian force, which had itself been giving way, turned and came back into the fight. Caught between the two, the imperial army dissolved into a disorderly flight.13

Medieval miniature of charging horsemen with lances overrunning fallen soldiers and shields
Bulgarian horsemen rout the Byzantine army at Anchialus in 917, as illustrated in the Madrid Skylitzes, a 12th-century copy of John Skylitzes' chronicle. Public domain
A Byzantine army marched out to crush Bulgaria, and was itself destroyed on the shore.

Why the Byzantines broke

The Byzantine historians struggled to explain the disaster, and they told two stories. Skylitzes says that Leo Phokas dismounted at a spring to wash off his sweat and refresh himself. His horse broke loose and ran riderless through the camp, the soldiers took it for a sign that their commander had fallen, and they panicked and fled. Leo the Deacon blamed politics instead: news came that Romanos Lekapenos had sailed for Constantinople to seize the throne, and Leo Phokas abandoned the line to race him there.14

Skylitzes himself could not decide which story was true and concluded that it made no difference, since the battle was shamefully lost either way. Both stories tell of commanders thinking of their own ambitions rather than the empire. Romanos was accused of leaving the land army to its fate and failing to rescue the fugitives; he escaped being blinded for it only through powerful friends at court. Within three years he had been proclaimed co-emperor, which in practice made him the ruler of the empire.15

The massacre

The flight cost the Byzantines far more than the fighting. The Byzantine sources only lament the scale of the slaughter without giving figures; one says soldiers were trampled by their own comrades, another speaks of death by the sword, by drowning and under the hooves of horses, with only a few escaping. Constantine Lips, John Grapson and other experienced officers were among the dead. Leo Phokas got away to Mesembria and sailed to Constantinople.16

William Miller, writing in the Cambridge Medieval History, summed it up in one word: Simeon annihilated the Byzantine army at Anchialus. The bones Leo the Deacon described, still visible decades later, are the most vivid testimony to how many men died there.17

After Anchialus

Simeon's men followed up the victory with a march toward Constantinople, and Leo Phokas, still trusted by the regency, met them again at Katasyrtai, on the approaches to the capital, later that year. The sources disagree about the result; Leszka concludes that the Bulgarians, raiding rather than besieging, did not reach the walls. Bulgaria, Miller writes, became for a brief period the dominant power of the Balkan peninsula, its rule stretching from the Black Sea to the Ionian Sea.18

The victory changed Simeon's ambitions. Leszka argues that it convinced him he could only win his place in the Christian world by force, and perhaps that God was on his side. Within a few years he styled himself basileus of the Romans, emperor of the Romans as well as of the Bulgarians, and in 923 his army stood before Constantinople again. He never took it.19

Simeon died in 927. His weaker son Peter married a granddaughter of Romanos Lekapenos and won recognition of his imperial title, but Bulgaria declined under Magyar, Pecheneg and Rus attacks. Less than a century after Anchialus, Basil II broke the Bulgarian army at Kleidion in 1014, and in 1018 Bulgaria lost its independence.20› Basil II the Bulgar-Slayer

For the wider story, see the greatest battles of the Byzantine Empire, the Middle Ages era page, and 20 August in history.

Frequently asked questions

When and where was the Battle of Anchialus?

It was fought on 20 August 917 near the fortress of Anchialus on the Black Sea coast of modern Bulgaria, probably by the small river Achelous, which gives the battle its other name.21

Who won the Battle of Anchialus?

The First Bulgarian Empire under Tsar Simeon I, decisively; the Byzantine army was destroyed.

Who commanded at Anchialus?

Tsar Simeon I led the Bulgarians. The Byzantine land army was commanded by Leo Phokas, domestic of the scholai, while the fleet under Romanos Lekapenos, the future emperor, operated on the Danube.22

How big were the armies?

No Byzantine source says. The Arab writer al-Masudi gives about 62,000 Byzantines and 60,000 Bulgarians, but it is not certain that he describes this battle, and Mirosław Leszka rejects the figures, estimating each army at roughly 15,000 to 25,000.23

How did the Byzantines lose?

Their attack began well, but Simeon struck their rear with his reserves, the Bulgarian main force rallied, and the Byzantine retreat became a rout and a massacre. Byzantine writers blamed a riderless horse that made the army think Leo Phokas was dead, or Leo's rush to Constantinople to beat Romanos Lekapenos to the throne.24

Why was Anchialus so significant?

The Byzantine army was annihilated, and the victory marked the height of Bulgarian power under Simeon, who afterward claimed the title of emperor of the Romans.25

What happened afterward?

Simeon dominated the Balkans and threatened Constantinople but never took it; Bulgaria was finally subdued a century later in Basil II's wars, decided at Kleidion in 1014 and completed in 1018.

Notes

A number in the text points to a note; each note names the works that paragraph draws on, listed in full under Sources.

  1. Mirosław J. Leszka, Symeon I Wielki a Bizancjum. Z dziejów stosunków bułgarsko-bizantyńskich w latach 893-927. ↩
  2. Mirosław J. Leszka, Symeon I Wielki a Bizancjum. Z dziejów stosunków bułgarsko-bizantyńskich w latach 893-927; William Miller, “The Rise and Fall of the First Bulgarian Empire (679-1018)”. ↩
  3. Mirosław J. Leszka, Symeon I Wielki a Bizancjum. Z dziejów stosunków bułgarsko-bizantyńskich w latach 893-927; William Miller, “The Rise and Fall of the First Bulgarian Empire (679-1018)”. ↩
  4. Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Simeon I”; William Miller, “The Rise and Fall of the First Bulgarian Empire (679-1018)”; Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Bulgaria”; Mirosław J. Leszka, Symeon I Wielki a Bizancjum. Z dziejów stosunków bułgarsko-bizantyńskich w latach 893-927. ↩
  5. Mirosław J. Leszka, Symeon I Wielki a Bizancjum. Z dziejów stosunków bułgarsko-bizantyńskich w latach 893-927; Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Bulgaria”; Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Simeon I”; William Miller, “The Rise and Fall of the First Bulgarian Empire (679-1018)”. ↩
  6. William Miller, “The Rise and Fall of the First Bulgarian Empire (679-1018)”; Mirosław J. Leszka, Symeon I Wielki a Bizancjum. Z dziejów stosunków bułgarsko-bizantyńskich w latach 893-927. ↩
  7. Mirosław J. Leszka, Symeon I Wielki a Bizancjum. Z dziejów stosunków bułgarsko-bizantyńskich w latach 893-927; William Miller, “The Rise and Fall of the First Bulgarian Empire (679-1018)”. ↩
  8. Mirosław J. Leszka, Symeon I Wielki a Bizancjum. Z dziejów stosunków bułgarsko-bizantyńskich w latach 893-927; William Miller, “The Rise and Fall of the First Bulgarian Empire (679-1018)”. ↩
  9. Mirosław J. Leszka, Symeon I Wielki a Bizancjum. Z dziejów stosunków bułgarsko-bizantyńskich w latach 893-927; Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Romanus I Lecapenus”. ↩
  10. Mirosław J. Leszka, Symeon I Wielki a Bizancjum. Z dziejów stosunków bułgarsko-bizantyńskich w latach 893-927. ↩
  11. Mirosław J. Leszka, Symeon I Wielki a Bizancjum. Z dziejów stosunków bułgarsko-bizantyńskich w latach 893-927. ↩
  12. Mirosław J. Leszka, Symeon I Wielki a Bizancjum. Z dziejów stosunków bułgarsko-bizantyńskich w latach 893-927; William Miller, “The Rise and Fall of the First Bulgarian Empire (679-1018)”. ↩
  13. Mirosław J. Leszka, Symeon I Wielki a Bizancjum. Z dziejów stosunków bułgarsko-bizantyńskich w latach 893-927. ↩
  14. Mirosław J. Leszka, Symeon I Wielki a Bizancjum. Z dziejów stosunków bułgarsko-bizantyńskich w latach 893-927. ↩
  15. Mirosław J. Leszka, Symeon I Wielki a Bizancjum. Z dziejów stosunków bułgarsko-bizantyńskich w latach 893-927; Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Romanus I Lecapenus”. ↩
  16. Mirosław J. Leszka, Symeon I Wielki a Bizancjum. Z dziejów stosunków bułgarsko-bizantyńskich w latach 893-927. ↩
  17. William Miller, “The Rise and Fall of the First Bulgarian Empire (679-1018)”; Mirosław J. Leszka, Symeon I Wielki a Bizancjum. Z dziejów stosunków bułgarsko-bizantyńskich w latach 893-927. ↩
  18. Mirosław J. Leszka, Symeon I Wielki a Bizancjum. Z dziejów stosunków bułgarsko-bizantyńskich w latach 893-927; William Miller, “The Rise and Fall of the First Bulgarian Empire (679-1018)”. ↩
  19. Mirosław J. Leszka, Symeon I Wielki a Bizancjum. Z dziejów stosunków bułgarsko-bizantyńskich w latach 893-927; William Miller, “The Rise and Fall of the First Bulgarian Empire (679-1018)”; Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Simeon I”; Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Bulgaria”. ↩
  20. William Miller, “The Rise and Fall of the First Bulgarian Empire (679-1018)”; Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Bulgaria”. ↩
  21. Mirosław J. Leszka, Symeon I Wielki a Bizancjum. Z dziejów stosunków bułgarsko-bizantyńskich w latach 893-927; William Miller, “The Rise and Fall of the First Bulgarian Empire (679-1018)”. ↩
  22. Mirosław J. Leszka, Symeon I Wielki a Bizancjum. Z dziejów stosunków bułgarsko-bizantyńskich w latach 893-927; Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Romanus I Lecapenus”. ↩
  23. Mirosław J. Leszka, Symeon I Wielki a Bizancjum. Z dziejów stosunków bułgarsko-bizantyńskich w latach 893-927. ↩
  24. Mirosław J. Leszka, Symeon I Wielki a Bizancjum. Z dziejów stosunków bułgarsko-bizantyńskich w latach 893-927. ↩
  25. William Miller, “The Rise and Fall of the First Bulgarian Empire (679-1018)”; Mirosław J. Leszka, Symeon I Wielki a Bizancjum. Z dziejów stosunków bułgarsko-bizantyńskich w latach 893-927. ↩

Sources

Battle honors of your homeland

The turning points of history

Marathon, Gaugamela, Cannae, Constantinople, Waterloo, Stalingrad: the days the world changed course.

Based on your country, which we do not store · why? ·

Hold the line at Anchialus

Echoes of Battle brings the great battles of history to life, scene by scene on the real map. Enlist below and we will send word to your inbox the day it launches.