What happened at the Battle of Kraśnik?
From 23 to 25 August 1914, in the first weeks of World War I, the Austro-Hungarian First Army of General Viktor Dankl met the Russian Fourth Army of General Anton von Salza head-on south of the town of Kraśnik, in the Lublin region of what was then Russian Poland. Dankl's army won the three-day fight and drove the Russians back toward Lublin, and Salza lost his command. It was Austria-Hungary's first victory of the war, but Russian victories around Lemberg soon forced Dankl to give the ground up again.1
For three days at the end of August 1914 two armies marching toward each other fought it out south of the little town of Kraśnik, between the Vistula and Lublin. The Austro-Hungarian army won, and its commander later took the name of the town into his title. Within weeks the victory had been swallowed up by a far larger defeat.2
Background
In 1914 Russian Poland jutted west between Germany and Austria-Hungary. The Austro-Hungarian chief of staff, Franz Conrad von Hötzendorf, planned to open the war in the east with an offensive northward into this salient, between the Vistula and the Bug, aimed at Lublin and Chełm. Two armies, the westernmost of the Austro-Hungarian line, would make the attack: the First under General Viktor Dankl and the Fourth under General Moritz von Auffenberg. Further east, other armies stood guard around Lemberg (today Lviv).3
Against Austria-Hungary the Russians sent the armies of their Southwestern Front, under General Nikolai Ivanov. Two of them, the Fourth under Salza and the Fifth under General Paul von Plehwe, gathered on the line from Lublin to Chełm, while others were to strike from the east toward Lemberg. The historian Jacek Legieć, who has studied the Russian accounts of these battles, notes that the Fourth Army was to cross the San between Leżajsk and the river's mouth and push on toward Mielec and Dębica, deep in Galicia.4

How well each side read the other is a matter of debate. Britannica judges that the Russians had gauged Austrian intentions accurately and that the two war plans were almost mirror images of each other. John Rickard, writing on HistoryOfWar, stresses the misjudgments instead: the Russians thought the Austrians were massing around Lemberg, while the Austrians expected the Russians to gather slowly and further west. Legieć shows that the Russian historians of the interwar years were harsh on their own plan. They found it based on Austrian plans obtained in 1912 rather than on fresh intelligence, and one of them, Yuri Danilov, blamed the setbacks on an underestimate of Dankl's army and on what he called the Lwów mirage, the lure of the Galician capital.5
Armies and commanders
Viktor Dankl was born in Udine in 1854 and had been a general of cavalry since 1912. When the war began he was given the First Army, which stood at the western end of the Austro-Hungarian line, on the left wing, with its own left flank resting on the Vistula.6

His orders were to march north toward Lublin and break up any Russian build-up there, the first blow of the offensive that Conrad had aimed at Lublin and Chełm.7
Salza's Fourth Army, for its part, was meant to head south and west into Galicia. Rickard writes that it was sent into the country west of Przemyśl to cut off an Austrian retreat; Legieć gives its line of march across the San toward Mielec and Dębica. Either way, the two armies were marching toward each other.8
The sources used here give no reliable figures for the strength of either army or for their losses, and this article does not offer any.
The battle in phases
The armies collided south of Kraśnik on 23 August. The fighting ran along a front that Legieć traces from the Vistula to Szczebrzeszyn, and it was the first battle of the war on the southern sector of the Eastern Front, as the National Museum in Lublin noted when it opened an exhibition on the battle in 2024.9

For three days, from 23 to 25 August, the First Army pressed forward. The Russians were driven back, and by the evening of the third day the Fourth Army was in retreat toward Lublin.10
Turning point
The decision came on 25 August. Dankl's army had won, the Russian Fourth Army was falling back toward Lublin, and Salza was removed from command. His successor at the head of the Fourth Army was General Aleksei Evert.11

The defeat changed the Russian plan. Ivanov ordered Plehwe's Fifth Army, which had been heading south, to turn west and come to the help of the beaten Fourth; Legieć writes that the order reached it on 25 August. Reinforcements also came from the new Russian Ninth Army.12
The turn walked the Fifth Army straight into Auffenberg's advancing Fourth Army. In the battle of Komarów that followed, from 26 August to the first days of September, the Russian Fifth Army came close to disaster as the Austrians tried to encircle three of its corps. For a few days Conrad's offensive toward Lublin and Chełm looked like a success.13 › Battle of Tannenberg, 1914
Aftermath
Dankl followed the beaten Russians north to the approaches of Lublin. But the battle that mattered was being lost further east. The Russians defeated the Austro-Hungarian armies covering Lemberg, the city fell, and the whole Austro-Hungarian front had to fall back. The ground won at Kraśnik was given up.14
The First Army went forward again in October, alongside Hindenburg's German Ninth Army, and was driven back again before the month was out by Russian counterattacks. By the end of 1914 it held a trench line on the Nida, covering Kraków.15
Dankl's war took him south. When Italy entered the war in May 1915 he became commander of the defense of Tyrol, and he was promoted to colonel general in 1916. That year his career at the front ended. The Neue Deutsche Biographie says he was relieved of command after disagreements with the army high command; the catalogue of the painter John Quincy Adams says he stepped down for reasons of health.16

Legacy and memory
The battle stayed with Dankl's name. In 1917 he was made a baron with the title von Kraśnik, in memory of the victory, and in 1918 a count. He died in Innsbruck in 1941.17 › Battle of Caporetto, 1917
Historians have weighed it modestly. Rickard calls Kraśnik a minor victory in a campaign that Austria-Hungary lost; Britannica counts it, with Komarów, among the early successes of an offensive that ended in serious defeat in Galicia.18
In Poland the battle has had less attention. When the Museum of the 24th Uhlan Regiment in Kraśnik, a branch of the National Museum in Lublin, opened a temporary exhibition on it in September 2024, it called it Kraśnik 1914: a forgotten battle of the Poles, and presented it as the first Austro-Hungarian victory of the war. The invasion of Serbia had been thrown back at the Cer mountain the week before, so the claim holds.19
Visiting today
The museum stands at Piłsudskiego 7 in Kraśnik. Besides its rooms on the 24th Uhlan Regiment, which was stationed in the town from 1922, it has a permanent exhibition on World War I and the battle of 1914.20 › Battle of Łódź, 1914
Notes
A number in the text points to a note; each note names the works that paragraph draws on, listed in full under Sources.
- John Rickard, “Battle of Krasnik, 23-25 August 1914”; Jacek Legieć, “Bitwa pod Komarowem w historiografii rosyjskiej (do 1941 r.)”; Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa, “Kraśnik 1914”; Great Soviet Encyclopedia, “Evert, Aleksei Ermolaevich”. ↩
- John Rickard, “Battle of Krasnik, 23-25 August 1914”; Jacek Legieć, “Bitwa pod Komarowem w historiografii rosyjskiej (do 1941 r.)”; Oswald von Gschließer, “Dankl, Viktor Julius Ignaz Ferdinand, Freiherr von Krásnik”; Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Eastern Front (World War I)”. ↩
- Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Eastern Front (World War I)”; John Rickard, “Battle of Krasnik, 23-25 August 1914”. ↩
- Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Eastern Front (World War I)”; Jacek Legieć, “Bitwa pod Komarowem w historiografii rosyjskiej (do 1941 r.)”. ↩
- Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Eastern Front (World War I)”; John Rickard, “Battle of Krasnik, 23-25 August 1914”; Jacek Legieć, “Bitwa pod Komarowem w historiografii rosyjskiej (do 1941 r.)”. ↩
- Oswald von Gschließer, “Dankl, Viktor Julius Ignaz Ferdinand, Freiherr von Krásnik”; John Quincy Adams catalogue raisonné, “General Viktor Dankl with 2 officers of his staff, 1915”; John Rickard, “Battle of Krasnik, 23-25 August 1914”. ↩
- John Rickard, “Battle of Krasnik, 23-25 August 1914”; Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Eastern Front (World War I)”. ↩
- John Rickard, “Battle of Krasnik, 23-25 August 1914”; Jacek Legieć, “Bitwa pod Komarowem w historiografii rosyjskiej (do 1941 r.)”. ↩
- John Rickard, “Battle of Krasnik, 23-25 August 1914”; Jacek Legieć, “Bitwa pod Komarowem w historiografii rosyjskiej (do 1941 r.)”; Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa, “Kraśnik 1914”. ↩
- John Rickard, “Battle of Krasnik, 23-25 August 1914”; Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa, “Kraśnik 1914”; Jacek Legieć, “Bitwa pod Komarowem w historiografii rosyjskiej (do 1941 r.)”. ↩
- John Rickard, “Battle of Krasnik, 23-25 August 1914”; Jacek Legieć, “Bitwa pod Komarowem w historiografii rosyjskiej (do 1941 r.)”; Great Soviet Encyclopedia, “Evert, Aleksei Ermolaevich”. ↩
- Jacek Legieć, “Bitwa pod Komarowem w historiografii rosyjskiej (do 1941 r.)”; John Rickard, “Battle of Krasnik, 23-25 August 1914”; Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Eastern Front (World War I)”. ↩
- John Rickard, “Battle of Krasnik, 23-25 August 1914”; Jacek Legieć, “Bitwa pod Komarowem w historiografii rosyjskiej (do 1941 r.)”; Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Eastern Front (World War I)”. ↩
- Oswald von Gschließer, “Dankl, Viktor Julius Ignaz Ferdinand, Freiherr von Krásnik”; Jacek Legieć, “Bitwa pod Komarowem w historiografii rosyjskiej (do 1941 r.)”; John Rickard, “Battle of Krasnik, 23-25 August 1914”; Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Eastern Front (World War I)”. ↩
- Oswald von Gschließer, “Dankl, Viktor Julius Ignaz Ferdinand, Freiherr von Krásnik”; Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Eastern Front (World War I)”; Dennis E. Showalter, “World War I: The war in the east, 1914”. ↩
- Oswald von Gschließer, “Dankl, Viktor Julius Ignaz Ferdinand, Freiherr von Krásnik”; John Quincy Adams catalogue raisonné, “General Viktor Dankl with 2 officers of his staff, 1915”. ↩
- Oswald von Gschließer, “Dankl, Viktor Julius Ignaz Ferdinand, Freiherr von Krásnik”; John Quincy Adams catalogue raisonné, “General Viktor Dankl with 2 officers of his staff, 1915”. ↩
- John Rickard, “Battle of Krasnik, 23-25 August 1914”; Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Eastern Front (World War I)”. ↩
- Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa, “Kraśnik 1914”; Dennis E. Showalter, “World War I: The war in the east, 1914”. ↩
- Radio Lublin, “Nie tylko ułani. Darmowe zwiedzanie kraśnickiego muzeum”; Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa, “Kraśnik 1914”. ↩
Sources
- John Rickard, HistoryOfWar.org, “Battle of Krasnik, 23-25 August 1914”
- Jacek Legieć, Annales UMCS, sectio F, vol. 68 (2013), “Bitwa pod Komarowem w historiografii rosyjskiej (do 1941 r.)”
- Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa, European Heritage Days (Museum of the 24th Uhlan Regiment, National Museum in Lublin), “Kraśnik 1914: zapomniany bój Polaków”
- Great Soviet Encyclopedia, 3rd edition, “Эверт Алексей Ермолаевич” (Evert, Aleksei Ermolaevich)
- Oswald von Gschließer, Neue Deutsche Biographie 3 (1957), “Dankl, Viktor Julius Ignaz Ferdinand, Freiherr von Krásnik”
- Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Eastern Front (World War I)”
- John Quincy Adams catalogue raisonné (after the 1995 catalogue, cat. 107; painting in the Heeresgeschichtliches Museum, Vienna), “General Viktor Dankl with 2 officers of his staff, 1915”
- Dennis E. Showalter, Encyclopaedia Britannica, “World War I: The war in the east, 1914”
- Radio Lublin, 16 February 2022, “Nie tylko ułani. Darmowe zwiedzanie kraśnickiego muzeum”






