PLEnlist

Battle of Sinop, 1853: the Ottoman squadron burned at anchor

Crimean War · 30 November 1853 · Russian Empire vs Ottoman Empire · ~10 min read · Updated October 2026

Next anniversary: 30 November 2026, the 173rd anniversary 30 November in history ›

Painting of the Battle of Sinop at night: Russian ships of the line stand on the left while the Ottoman ships and the harbor burn in great red and orange flames under a sky of smoke.

Ivan Aivazovsky, The Battle of Sinop on 18 November 1853 (Night after the Battle) (1853), Central Naval Museum, St Petersburg, via Wikimedia Commons, public domain.

At a glance

Russian Empire (Black Sea Fleet)Vice Admiral Pavel Nakhimov; Admiral Novosilsky
vs
Ottoman EmpirePatrona Osman Pasha; Riyale Hüseyin Pasha
Date
30 November 1853 (18 November in the Russian calendar)
Location
The harbor of Sinop, Black Sea coast of Anatolia
War
Crimean War (1853 to 1856)
Strength
Ottomans: 12 ships and no ship of the line, with 434 guns and about 4,490 men (Fırat Küskü) or 430 guns and 4,200 men (Adolphus Slade); Russians: 6 ships of the line and 2 frigates with 710 to 720 guns (Russian naval chronicle, Presidential Library), joined at the end by 3 steamers
Losses
Ottoman dead put at over 2,000 (TDV Encyclopedia), 2,700 of 4,200 (Slade) or more than half of about 4,000 (Küskü); one Ottoman steamer escaped. Russians: no ships lost, 37 killed and 229 to 235 wounded (Russian naval chronicle, Presidential Library) or 38 killed and 240 wounded (Tarle)
Outcome
Russian victory; the Ottoman squadron destroyed and its commander captured; Britain and France drawn toward war
Quick answer

What happened at the Battle of Sinop?

On 30 November 1853, early in the Crimean War, a Russian squadron under Vice Admiral Pavel Nakhimov sailed into the harbor of Sinop on the Black Sea coast of Anatolia and destroyed an Ottoman squadron lying at anchor there. The Russian ships of the line, firing explosive shells, wrecked or burned every Ottoman warship but one steamer, and the Turkish quarter of the town burned. The Ottoman commander, Osman Pasha, was taken prisoner, and the outcry in Britain helped bring Britain and France into the war.1

The Ottoman ships fired first, and they never had a chance. Six Russian ships of the line came into the bay against a squadron that had nothing bigger than a frigate. By the time the guns fell silent, thousands of Ottoman sailors were dead, and within days the London papers would be calling it a massacre.2

Dark locator map of the Black Sea with the Crimean peninsula at the top and a gold star in a glowing circle on the northernmost point of the Anatolian coast, and a small world map inset with the area boxed
Sinop sits on the northernmost cape of Anatolia, the nearest point of the Ottoman coast to the Russian naval base at Sevastopol in the Crimea, across the Black Sea. Drawn for this article from Natural Earth data, with no modern borders. Location map: © Echoes of Battle (data: Natural Earth, public domain)

Who won the Battle of Sinop and why?

Russia won decisively. Nakhimov brought six ships of the line, several armed with heavy shell guns, against frigates, corvettes and small steamers anchored under weak shore batteries, so the Ottomans were outgunned from the first broadside. The Ottoman squadron had chosen to wait at anchor rather than run for home, and no help came from Constantinople or the allied fleets.3

Background: a war on the Danube and a squadron at sea

The Crimean War began as a war between Russia and the Ottoman Empire. In the summer of 1853 Russian troops occupied the Danubian principalities, and that autumn the Ottomans declared war. Britain and France backed the Sultan, and their fleets lay at the entrance to the Dardanelles to guard Constantinople, but they were not yet at war with Russia.4

That autumn the Ottoman navy sent a squadron into the Black Sea under Patrona Osman Pasha, with Riyale Hüseyin Pasha as his second in command. What it was for depends on who tells the story. Adolphus Slade, the British officer who served as an adviser to the Ottoman navy, wrote that the Czar believed it was carrying ammunition to the Circassians fighting Russia in the Caucasus; Russian accounts, from the historian Evgeny Tarle to the Presidential Library in Moscow, say it was meant to cover a landing of troops on the Caucasus coast.5

The Russian Black Sea Fleet was already at sea. On 17 November, by the Western calendar, the paddle frigate Vladimir, with Vice Admiral Vladimir Kornilov on board, fought and captured the Ottoman steamer Pervaz-i Bahri after a three-hour action. More ships of the line were sent from Sevastopol to join Nakhimov, who was cruising off the Anatolian coast.6

Sinop was a natural choice of refuge. Its sheltered southern harbor was the best natural anchorage on the Anatolian coast of the Black Sea, and its shipyard had built ships for the Ottoman navy for centuries.7

On the way a gale scattered the squadron, and the ships ran for Sinop to gather again. They arrived damaged, the flagship with a sprung mainyard, and their crews, poorly clothed for winter, were so worn by cold and wet that for hours they could not go aloft to furl the sails.8

Armies and commanders: two unequal squadrons

The Ottoman squadron at Sinop consisted of seven frigates, among them the Egyptian Dimyad, with three corvettes, two small steamers and transports, and not a single ship of the line. Fırat Küskü of Sinop University, who traced the battle through Ottoman archives and the British press, counts twelve ships with 434 guns and about 4,490 men; Slade gives 430 guns and 4,200 men. The Russian naval chronicle of 1948 lists the frigates by name and gives the squadron 472 guns.9

The shore offered little help. Slade describes the batteries of Sinop as a few small works with old guns, one of them masked by its own ships and another soon out of cartridges, and the British press noted that the town's defenses had been neglected for decades. The Russian chronicle counts six batteries with 24 guns, the Presidential Library 38 guns.10

Watercolor of a Russian admiral in a dark greatcoat and peaked cap with gold epaulettes standing on an earthwork beside powder barrels and a cannon, while sailors carry a wounded man on a stretcher behind him
Vice Admiral Pavel Nakhimov, the victor of Sinop, painted by Vasily Timm in 1855 on the bastions of Sevastopol, where he later commanded the defense. Vasily (Georg Wilhelm) Timm, Vice Admiral P. S. Nakhimov, 1855, Central Naval Museum, St Petersburg. Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Against them came the Russian Black Sea Fleet under Vice Admiral Pavel Nakhimov. From 23 November his three ships of the line watched the harbor from the open sea. By 29 November Rear Admiral Fyodor Novosilsky had joined him from Sevastopol with three more ships of the line and two frigates, and Nakhimov then had six ships of the line, the Imperatritsa Maria, Parizh, Velikii Knyaz Konstantin, Tri Sviatitelia, Rostislav and Chesma, and the frigates Kagul and Kulevchi. His heaviest guns were 68-pounders, and they fired explosive shells.11

The two sides counted the guns differently, but the gap was wide whichever way. The Russian chronicle gives Nakhimov's eight sailing ships 710 guns, 76 of them shell guns; the Presidential Library gives 720 Russian guns against 510 Ottoman ones; Tarle puts the Russian total at 716.12

Two commanders, two decisions

The Ottoman commander saw what was coming. He reported the Russian ships off the port and warned that without reinforcements disaster could follow, but no help came from Constantinople or from the British and French fleets. Slade writes that Osman Pasha, distrusting his captains' ability to keep station in a running fight and unwilling to face another gale, chose to wait for the enemy at anchor.13

He drew his ships up in a curve along the shore of the town, and that choice cost him. Tarle notes that the line followed the concave quay and hid many of the shore batteries behind the ships; Slade found one battery masked by its own squadron, and the British press reported that the ships blocked the line of fire of the guns on land.14

Nakhimov chose to attack the squadron in its own harbor. The Presidential Library explains that at sea it might have been joined by the British and French ships lying in Besika Bay; the Russian chronicle dates the decision to the arrival of Novosilsky's ships. On 29 November he issued a written order with the plan of attack: where each ship was to anchor, how to fire and which targets to take.15

The ships would go in under sail in two columns, which shortened the time they spent under fire and let them drop anchor quickly in their places. Nakhimov led one column in the Imperatritsa Maria, followed by the Konstantin and the Chesma; Novosilsky led the other in the Parizh, followed by the Tri Sviatitelia and the Rostislav. The frigates Kagul and Kulevchi stayed outside under sail to watch the Ottoman steamers and stop them from escaping.16

The battle in phases

The approach. About noon on 30 November the Russian ships of the line stood into the bay under all sail before a light wind. The morning had been foggy, which let the Russians come close before they could be clearly seen. As the Russians came in, the governor and the town's officials fled inland.17

Black and white Russian plan of a bay with a walled town on its shore, a line of numbered ships anchored in a curve before it, and two lines of Russian ships approaching from the open sea, with a numbered legend and a scale
A Russian staff plan of the battle on the Sinop roadstead, published in 1913: the Ottoman ships (numbered) lie in a curve before the town, and the Russian ships of the line come in from the sea in two lines. The legend lists the Ottoman frigates, corvettes, steamers, transports and an English merchant vessel. Andrei Zaionchkovsky, Vostochnaya voina 1853 to 1856, vol. 2, part 1 (St Petersburg, 1913), plan 14. Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

The first shots. The Ottoman ships fired first, the flagship Avnillah leading, and as the Russians came in, several of their ships suffered badly from the Ottoman fire. Then the Russian ships of the line anchored in their appointed places and replied with full broadsides.18

The destruction. Line-of-battle ships firing 68-pounder shells into frigates and corvettes had only one possible result. Ships caught fire, and men drowned trying to swim ashore. The Nizamiye burned and was destroyed, and on the frigate Navek-i Bahri her captain, Ali Bey, blew up his own ship rather than let her be taken; the Russian chronicle and Tarle credit her destruction to the guns of the Chesma and the Konstantin. One by one the burning frigates and corvettes cut their cables and drifted ashore.19

Colored painting of a battle in a harbor: Russian ships of the line with white ensigns fire broadsides through clouds of smoke, an Ottoman ship explodes in a column of fire, and the walls and towers of a fortress town rise on the right
The Russian ships of the line pound the Ottoman squadron under the walls of Sinop, as Alexei Bogolyubov painted the battle in 1860. Alexei Bogolyubov, The Battle of Sinop, 1860. Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

How long it lasted. Slade writes that the action was decided in an hour and a half. Russian accounts, which count until the last shore battery fell silent, give about four hours.20

The steamer that got away. One ship escaped. The steamer Taif slipped her cable, broke out past the frigates waiting outside the bay and then ran into Kornilov's steamers, which had come from Sevastopol to reinforce Nakhimov; she fought her way past them too and carried the news to Constantinople. Slade says she reached the Bosphorus on the afternoon of 2 December; Küskü dates the arrival of the news in Istanbul to 3 December. A long-told story put Slade himself aboard her, a story repeated even in recent accounts, but Küskü shows that he was not, and Slade's own narrative places him in Constantinople when the news came.21

Turning point: fire on the town

What turned a victory into a scandal was what came after. Slade writes that if Nakhimov had ceased fire once the action was decided, his credit would have been unmixed. Instead the Russians kept up their fire with shot, shell and incendiary carcasses on the stranded wrecks and their crews, and on the town behind them, until its Turkish quarter was ablaze.22

Slade, a sailor himself, also blamed the Ottoman side. In his judgment the squadron should have moored close inshore in shallow water, landed some of its guns to build batteries on the cliffs and sent ashore its boats, spars and sails, everything that could burn or splinter; anchored where it was, it was a target.23

Pencil drawing of a bay beneath a hill crowned with ruined walls and towers, with a wrecked ship's hull lying on its side in the shallows and broken timbers floating in the water
The wreck-strewn bay of Sinop as a young British officer, George Tryon, drew it after the battle, when the allied steamers came to bring help. George Tryon, drawing of Sinop Bay, 1854, from C. C. Penrose Fitzgerald, Life of Vice-Admiral Sir George Tryon (Edinburgh: Blackwood, 1897). Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Counting the losses

The Ottoman toll was terrible, though no figure is certain. Slade put the dead at 2,700 out of 4,200; Kinglake reported that men in authority believed 4,000 had been killed; Mehmet Öz, in the TDV Encyclopedia of Islam, gives over 2,000; Küskü cites the historian Enver Ziya Karal for more than half of a crew of about 4,000; the Russian chronicle gives two thirds of 4,500, and the Presidential Library more than 3,000 killed and drowned.24

Osman Pasha was carried away wounded, a prisoner. Slade counts five officers, the commander among them, and about 150 men taken by the Russians; the Presidential Library gives about 200 prisoners. About a thousand Ottoman sailors, Slade adds, had gone off into the interior on the evening of the battle.25

The Russians lost no ships. The chronicle of 1948 counts 37 killed and 229 wounded, the Presidential Library 37 killed and 235 wounded, and Tarle 38 killed and 240 wounded. An officer quoted by Tarle recalled that the Imperatritsa Maria, which led the way and anchored closest to the Ottoman broadsides, suffered most.26

When the British steamer Retribution and the French Mogador reached Sinop days later, with Slade aboard to bring help, they found the shore of the bay lined with wrecks and strewn with corpses. Not a mast was standing, and the town looked, in Slade's words, like a town after an assault. The wounded had lain for days with little care; the allied ships brought surgeons and began carrying survivors to Constantinople.27

Aftermath: from Sinop to war

The victors sailed home. Nakhimov's squadron left for Sevastopol on 2 December, and despite the damage every ship made the stormy crossing. Nicholas I gave Nakhimov the Order of St George, second class, one of the rarest Russian military awards.28

The news reached London and Paris on 11 December and filled the British papers from the next day. The press called it the massacre of Sinope, and as Kinglake put it, few men in England doubted that it had been a treacherous deed.29

The government in London, pressed by Napoleon III and by its own public, decided that such a disaster must not happen again. The admirals were told to secure the command of the Black Sea and keep the Russian fleet in its harbors.30

Kinglake himself judged that charge unjust. In his view the attack was no stealthy surprise, since the Russian fleet had cruised openly off Sinop for days, and Russia had every right to destroy an enemy squadron once the Ottomans were fighting on the Danube. Public anger, he argued, was turned against the Czar instead of the British ministers, ambassadors and admirals who had let the squadron lie unprotected.31

Whatever the justice of it, the effect was decisive. The British and French fleets entered the Black Sea early in January 1854, and at the end of March Britain and France declared war on Russia. The war that followed would be fought above all in the Crimea, around the base from which Nakhimov had sailed.32 › Siege of Sevastopol, 1854

Legacy and memory

Sinop showed what shells could do to wooden ships. The Russian ships of the line carried 68-pounder shell guns on their lower decks, 76 of them by the chronicle's count, and the Presidential Library calls Sinop the first battle in which such guns were used on a large scale and the last great battle of the age of sail.33 › Battle of Kinburn, 1855

For Sinop the cost was lasting. Trade moved to Samsun and Trabzon, and the town never regained its old place on the Black Sea. In memory of the sailors who died, the Ottoman state built a Martyrs' Fountain near the shipyard, paid for by Sultan Abdülmecid, and it still stands in the town.34

Russia remembers the day as the greatest victory of its Black Sea Fleet. The anniversary, 18 November in the old Russian calendar, is kept as 1 December, a Day of Military Glory under a federal law of 1995.35

Notes

A number in the text points to a note; each note names the works that paragraph draws on, listed in full under Sources.

  1. Fırat Küskü, “Bir Felaketin Yankıları: İngiliz Basınında Sinop Baskını (Echoes of a Disaster: The Sinop Raid in the British Press)”; Adolphus Slade, “Turkey and the Crimean War”; Alexander W. Kinglake, “The Invasion of the Crimea, vol. 2”. ↩
  2. Adolphus Slade, “Turkey and the Crimean War”; Alexander W. Kinglake, “The Invasion of the Crimea, vol. 2”. ↩
  3. Boevaya letopis russkogo flota, “18 November 1853: the Battle of Sinop”; Presidential Library, “The Battle of Sinop”; Adolphus Slade, “Turkey and the Crimean War”. ↩
  4. Adolphus Slade, “Turkey and the Crimean War”; Alexander W. Kinglake, “The Invasion of the Crimea, vol. 2”; Presidential Library, “The Battle of Sinop”. ↩
  5. Adolphus Slade, “Turkey and the Crimean War”; Evgeny Tarle, “Krymskaya voina, vol. 1, chapter 7”; Presidential Library, “The Battle of Sinop”. ↩
  6. Boevaya letopis russkogo flota, “18 November 1853: the Battle of Sinop”; Evgeny Tarle, “Krymskaya voina, vol. 1, chapter 7”. ↩
  7. Mehmet Öz, “Sinop”; Fırat Küskü, “Bir Felaketin Yankıları: İngiliz Basınında Sinop Baskını (Echoes of a Disaster: The Sinop Raid in the British Press)”. ↩
  8. Adolphus Slade, “Turkey and the Crimean War”; Fırat Küskü, “Bir Felaketin Yankıları: İngiliz Basınında Sinop Baskını (Echoes of a Disaster: The Sinop Raid in the British Press)”. ↩
  9. Fırat Küskü, “Bir Felaketin Yankıları: İngiliz Basınında Sinop Baskını (Echoes of a Disaster: The Sinop Raid in the British Press)”; Adolphus Slade, “Turkey and the Crimean War”; Boevaya letopis russkogo flota, “18 November 1853: the Battle of Sinop”. ↩
  10. Adolphus Slade, “Turkey and the Crimean War”; Fırat Küskü, “Bir Felaketin Yankıları: İngiliz Basınında Sinop Baskını (Echoes of a Disaster: The Sinop Raid in the British Press)”; Boevaya letopis russkogo flota, “18 November 1853: the Battle of Sinop”; Presidential Library, “The Battle of Sinop”. ↩
  11. Boevaya letopis russkogo flota, “18 November 1853: the Battle of Sinop”; Presidential Library, “The Battle of Sinop”; Adolphus Slade, “Turkey and the Crimean War”. ↩
  12. Boevaya letopis russkogo flota, “18 November 1853: the Battle of Sinop”; Presidential Library, “The Battle of Sinop”; Evgeny Tarle, “Krymskaya voina, vol. 1, chapter 7”. ↩
  13. Alexander W. Kinglake, “The Invasion of the Crimea, vol. 2”; Adolphus Slade, “Turkey and the Crimean War”; Fırat Küskü, “Bir Felaketin Yankıları: İngiliz Basınında Sinop Baskını (Echoes of a Disaster: The Sinop Raid in the British Press)”. ↩
  14. Evgeny Tarle, “Krymskaya voina, vol. 1, chapter 7”; Adolphus Slade, “Turkey and the Crimean War”; Fırat Küskü, “Bir Felaketin Yankıları: İngiliz Basınında Sinop Baskını (Echoes of a Disaster: The Sinop Raid in the British Press)”. ↩
  15. Presidential Library, “The Battle of Sinop”; Boevaya letopis russkogo flota, “18 November 1853: the Battle of Sinop”; Fırat Küskü, “Bir Felaketin Yankıları: İngiliz Basınında Sinop Baskını (Echoes of a Disaster: The Sinop Raid in the British Press)”. ↩
  16. Presidential Library, “The Battle of Sinop”; Boevaya letopis russkogo flota, “18 November 1853: the Battle of Sinop”; Fırat Küskü, “Bir Felaketin Yankıları: İngiliz Basınında Sinop Baskını (Echoes of a Disaster: The Sinop Raid in the British Press)”. ↩
  17. Adolphus Slade, “Turkey and the Crimean War”; Fırat Küskü, “Bir Felaketin Yankıları: İngiliz Basınında Sinop Baskını (Echoes of a Disaster: The Sinop Raid in the British Press)”; Boevaya letopis russkogo flota, “18 November 1853: the Battle of Sinop”. ↩
  18. Adolphus Slade, “Turkey and the Crimean War”; Alexander W. Kinglake, “The Invasion of the Crimea, vol. 2”; Boevaya letopis russkogo flota, “18 November 1853: the Battle of Sinop”; Fırat Küskü, “Bir Felaketin Yankıları: İngiliz Basınında Sinop Baskını (Echoes of a Disaster: The Sinop Raid in the British Press)”. ↩
  19. Adolphus Slade, “Turkey and the Crimean War”; Fırat Küskü, “Bir Felaketin Yankıları: İngiliz Basınında Sinop Baskını (Echoes of a Disaster: The Sinop Raid in the British Press)”; Boevaya letopis russkogo flota, “18 November 1853: the Battle of Sinop”; Evgeny Tarle, “Krymskaya voina, vol. 1, chapter 7”. ↩
  20. Adolphus Slade, “Turkey and the Crimean War”; Boevaya letopis russkogo flota, “18 November 1853: the Battle of Sinop”; Presidential Library, “The Battle of Sinop”. ↩
  21. Adolphus Slade, “Turkey and the Crimean War”; Fırat Küskü, “Bir Felaketin Yankıları: İngiliz Basınında Sinop Baskını (Echoes of a Disaster: The Sinop Raid in the British Press)”; Boevaya letopis russkogo flota, “18 November 1853: the Battle of Sinop”. ↩
  22. Adolphus Slade, “Turkey and the Crimean War”; Fırat Küskü, “Bir Felaketin Yankıları: İngiliz Basınında Sinop Baskını (Echoes of a Disaster: The Sinop Raid in the British Press)”. ↩
  23. Adolphus Slade, “Turkey and the Crimean War”. ↩
  24. Adolphus Slade, “Turkey and the Crimean War”; Alexander W. Kinglake, “The Invasion of the Crimea, vol. 2”; Mehmet Öz, “Sinop”; Fırat Küskü, “Bir Felaketin Yankıları: İngiliz Basınında Sinop Baskını (Echoes of a Disaster: The Sinop Raid in the British Press)”; Boevaya letopis russkogo flota, “18 November 1853: the Battle of Sinop”; Presidential Library, “The Battle of Sinop”. ↩
  25. Adolphus Slade, “Turkey and the Crimean War”; Presidential Library, “The Battle of Sinop”; Boevaya letopis russkogo flota, “18 November 1853: the Battle of Sinop”. ↩
  26. Boevaya letopis russkogo flota, “18 November 1853: the Battle of Sinop”; Presidential Library, “The Battle of Sinop”; Evgeny Tarle, “Krymskaya voina, vol. 1, chapter 7”. ↩
  27. Adolphus Slade, “Turkey and the Crimean War”; Fırat Küskü, “Bir Felaketin Yankıları: İngiliz Basınında Sinop Baskını (Echoes of a Disaster: The Sinop Raid in the British Press)”. ↩
  28. Adolphus Slade, “Turkey and the Crimean War”; Evgeny Tarle, “Krymskaya voina, vol. 1, chapter 7”; Presidential Library, “The Battle of Sinop”. ↩
  29. Alexander W. Kinglake, “The Invasion of the Crimea, vol. 2”; Fırat Küskü, “Bir Felaketin Yankıları: İngiliz Basınında Sinop Baskını (Echoes of a Disaster: The Sinop Raid in the British Press)”. ↩
  30. Alexander W. Kinglake, “The Invasion of the Crimea, vol. 2”; Fırat Küskü, “Bir Felaketin Yankıları: İngiliz Basınında Sinop Baskını (Echoes of a Disaster: The Sinop Raid in the British Press)”. ↩
  31. Alexander W. Kinglake, “The Invasion of the Crimea, vol. 2”. ↩
  32. Alexander W. Kinglake, “The Invasion of the Crimea, vol. 2”; Fırat Küskü, “Bir Felaketin Yankıları: İngiliz Basınında Sinop Baskını (Echoes of a Disaster: The Sinop Raid in the British Press)”. ↩
  33. Presidential Library, “The Battle of Sinop”; Boevaya letopis russkogo flota, “18 November 1853: the Battle of Sinop”. ↩
  34. Fırat Küskü, “Bir Felaketin Yankıları: İngiliz Basınında Sinop Baskını (Echoes of a Disaster: The Sinop Raid in the British Press)”; Mehmet Öz, “Sinop”; Nurcan Yazıcı Metin, “Arşiv Belgelerine Göre Sinop’taki Şüheda/Şehitler Çeşmesi (The Martyrs’ Fountain in Sinop in the Light of Archive Documents)”. ↩
  35. Federal Law No. 32-FZ, “О днях воинской славы и памятных датах России”; Parlamentskaya Gazeta, “День 1 декабря в истории”; Presidential Library, “The Battle of Sinop”. ↩

Sources

Frequently asked questions

When was the Battle of Sinop?

It was fought on 30 November 1853, which was 18 November in the Julian calendar then used in Russia, in the harbor of Sinop on the Black Sea coast of Turkey.

Who won the Battle of Sinop?

Russia. Vice Admiral Pavel Nakhimov's squadron destroyed the Ottoman squadron at anchor and captured its commander, Osman Pasha.

How many Ottomans died at Sinop?

No figure is certain. Adolphus Slade gave 2,700 dead out of 4,200, the TDV Encyclopedia of Islam over 2,000, and Fırat Küskü, citing Enver Ziya Karal, more than half of a crew of about 4,000.

Did any Ottoman ship escape from Sinop?

Yes. The steamer Taif broke out past the Russian ships and carried the news to Constantinople. Contrary to a long-told story, Adolphus Slade was not aboard her.

Why was Sinop called a massacre?

Because the Russians kept firing after the battle was decided, on wrecked ships, drowning men and the town itself. The British press called it the massacre of Sinope.

Why was the Battle of Sinop important?

The outcry it caused in Britain helped bring Britain and France into the Crimean War, and it was one of the first battles in which heavy shell guns were used on a large scale against wooden ships.

How is the Battle of Sinop remembered?

In Turkey by the Martyrs' Fountain built in Sinop for the sailors who died; in Russia by a Day of Military Glory on 1 December.

Battle honors of your homeland

The turning points of history

Marathon, Gaugamela, Cannae, Constantinople, Waterloo, Stalingrad: the days the world changed course.

Based on your country, which we do not store · why? ·

Steer through the fog at Sinop

Echoes of Battle brings the great battles of history to life, scene by scene on the real map. Enlist below and we will send word to your inbox the day it launches.

Or supply the campaign on Ko-fi ›