PLEnlist

Battle of Chemulpo Bay, 1904: the Varyag's hopeless sortie

Russo-Japanese War · 9 February 1904 · Japan vs Russia · ~11 min read · Updated October 2026

Next anniversary: 9 February 2027, the 123rd anniversary 9 February in history ›

Japanese woodblock print triptych: a white Japanese cruiser firing through clouds of smoke, a burning enemy ship breaking apart on the left, blue waves in the foreground.

Workshop of Tsukioka Kōgyo, “A Pictorial Report of the Russo-Japanese War, No. 1” (1904), color woodcut triptych showing the cruiser Asama, Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam, via Wikimedia Commons, CC0.

At a glance

Empire of JapanRear Admiral Uryū Sotokichi
vs
Russian EmpireCaptain Vsevolod Rudnev
Date
9 February 1904 (27 January in the Russian calendar of the time)
Location
Off Chemulpo, today Incheon, on the west coast of Korea
War
Russo-Japanese War; the first shots were exchanged here on 8 February
Forces
Japanese: six cruisers, led by the armored cruiser Asama, and eight torpedo boats, escorting three transports with about 2,500 soldiers; Russian: protected cruiser Varyag and gunboat Korietz
Losses
Russian, on the Varyag: 31 killed, 91 seriously and over 100 slightly wounded (British official history), 33 killed and 97 wounded (official Russian version, as Argumenty i Fakty gives it), 122 killed and wounded (Great Soviet Encyclopedia) or 82 killed and 190 wounded of her 570 men (Dawlish Chronicles); both ships scuttled. Japanese: none, by Japanese accounts
Outcome
Japanese victory; Japanese troops landed unopposed at Chemulpo
Quick answer

What happened at the Battle of Chemulpo Bay?

On 9 February 1904, at the start of the Russo-Japanese War, a Japanese squadron under Rear Admiral Uriu Sotokichi gave the Russian cruiser Varyag and gunboat Korietz, lying in the neutral Korean port of Chemulpo, until noon to leave or be attacked in harbor. Captain Vsevolod Rudnev sailed out to fight, was badly beaten in about an hour, and returned to port, where the Russians scuttled both ships.1

The first shots of the Russo-Japanese War were fired at Chemulpo on 8 February, and the battle that followed the next day was fought in front of an audience. British, French, Italian and American warships lay at anchor in the port, and the two Russian ships sailed out past them to a fight they could not win. For Japan the prize was not the ships but the harbor: the troops landed there opened the road to Seoul and, beyond it, to Manchuria.2

Dark locator map of the Yellow Sea with a gold star in a glowing circle on the west coast of Korea, the Liaodong peninsula and Shandong to the west, Japan to the southeast, and a small world map inset with the area marked
Chemulpo, today Incheon, lies on the west coast of Korea near Seoul. Port Arthur, the Russian fleet base, is at the tip of the Liaodong peninsula across the Yellow Sea to the northwest; Sasebo, where the Japanese squadron sailed from, is on Kyushu to the southeast. Drawn for this article from Natural Earth data, with no modern borders. Location map: © Echoes of Battle (data: Natural Earth, public domain)

Background: a war over Korea

The war grew out of the rivalry of Russia and Japan for Korea and Manchuria. Japan had beaten China in 1894 and 1895 and won the Liaodong peninsula, only to be forced by the European powers to give it back; Russia then leased Port Arthur, at its tip, as a naval base and poured troops into Manchuria during the Boxer Rebellion. Japan feared that Korea would be next. The British official history of the war says that for Japan it was politically desirable to forestall the Russians in Korea, and that holding its western harbors would give the Japanese fleet bases and save the army a long march toward Manchuria.3

Talks failed in early February 1904. On the night of 8 to 9 February, without a declaration of war, Japanese torpedo boats attacked the Russian squadron at Port Arthur. Formal declarations of war came only afterward, after the first shots had already been fired at Chemulpo.4 › Battle of the Yellow Sea, 1904

Two Russian ships in a neutral port

Chemulpo, today Incheon, lies on the west coast of Korea near the capital, Seoul. In early 1904 it held the Russian protected cruiser Varyag, built in Philadelphia, a ship of about 6,500 tons with twelve 6-inch guns, a designed speed of 23 knots and a crew of about 570, and the old gunboat Korietz. Neutral warships shared the anchorage: the British cruiser Talbot, the French Pascal, the Italian Elba and the American gunboat Vicksburg. So did the Japanese cruiser Chiyoda, which had spent weeks watching the Russians.5

The Russians did not expect war. The British official history blames the viceroy in the Far East, Admiral Alekseyev, for refusing to believe that war was imminent even at the last moment, and Britannica also judges his leadership poor. Antoine Vanner notes that the Russians at Chemulpo kept to their peacetime routine almost to the end.6

Armies and commanders

Rear Admiral Uriu Sotokichi led the Japanese 4th Division of protected cruisers, among them his flagship Naniwa, reinforced for the operation by the armored cruiser Asama, the most powerful ship on either side, and by torpedo boats. His task was to escort three transports carrying about 2,500 soldiers and put them ashore. Counts of his force differ slightly: the Great Soviet Encyclopedia gives one heavy and five light cruisers with eight torpedo boats, Argumenty i Fakty six cruisers and eight torpedo boats, and Vanner six cruisers, some eight smaller vessels and three transports.7

Portrait of Rear Admiral Uriu Sotokichi, Japanese commander at Chemulpo, with a thick mustache, in a dark suit and stiff white collar before blurred trees
Rear Admiral Uriu Sotokichi, who commanded the Japanese squadron at Chemulpo, in a later photograph in civilian dress. Bain News Service, Admiral Uriu, glass negative, early twentieth century, Library of Congress (detail). Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Against them stood one modern cruiser and one gunboat under Captain First Rank Vsevolod Rudnev of the Varyag. Uriu's ships outgunned them many times over. The British official history calls Rudnev's decision to fight gallant but his task hopeless; the Great Soviet Encyclopedia calls the battle heroic.8

The first shots, 8 February

On the afternoon of 8 February the Korietz left Chemulpo for Port Arthur, sent to report the Japanese ships seen at sea, and ran into the Japanese squadron at the harbor mouth. The accounts of what happened next differ. The British official history says the Russian captain, seeing that he would not be let through, turned back and sent his men to quarters, and that two shots were fired by mistake from a light gun; it adds, in a note, that the Korietz's captain said the Japanese had already fired three torpedoes. Vanner says the Chiyoda launched a torpedo after the gunboat's guns went off, and Robert Neff that the Korietz was fired upon. Either way the gunboat went back into port, and these were the first shots of the war.9

That evening the Japanese transports anchored off Chemulpo, close by the Russian ships, and began landing their troops. The landing started around 6 p.m. and was finished by 3 a.m. on 9 February. The Russians did nothing to stop it.10

The ultimatum

Early on 9 February Uriu sent the neutral commanders a letter, in English, from on board his flagship Naniwa. Hostilities existed between Japan and Russia, he wrote; if the Russian ships did not leave the port before noon he would attack them there; he asked the neutral ships to keep away from the scene of action, and promised that the attack would not take place before 4 p.m. to give them time. The text survives in the report of the American commander, W. A. Marshall, and Vanner quotes it in full.11

Rudnev received his own summons that morning, while the neutral captains were conferring. The British, French and Italian captains agreed to protest to Uriu against the breach of Korean neutrality, but they could do nothing more to shelter the Russian ships. The American commander was not at the meeting; in his own report Marshall says he was not invited, and that he had made clear beforehand that he would observe strict neutrality. Rudnev decided to fight outside the harbor.12

The battle in phases

Shortly after 11 a.m. the Varyag weighed anchor, with the Korietz following. As they passed the foreign cruisers, the Russian minister to Korea, Aleksandr Pavlov, reported, the crews stood at attention and cheered, and the band of the Italian Elba played the Russian national anthem; Vanner and Neff tell the same scene.13

Just before noon the Japanese opened fire, the Asama first, at about 7,500 yards. The range closed to 5,000 or 6,000 yards as the cruisers converged. The Varyag answered at once, but the Japanese, with every advantage of numbers and position, hit her again and again. The Korietz took little part: her shells fell short, and she soon turned back.14

Grainy view of the four-funneled cruiser Varyag on a calm sea after the Battle of Chemulpo Bay, 1904, black smoke pouring from her stern, two other smoking ships in the distance
The Varyag back in the anchorage after the action, smoke pouring from the fires aft, photographed by the American war correspondent Robert L. Dunn and published by Collier's in 1904. Robert L. Dunn (attributed), Russian cruiser Variag on fire, Chemulpo harbour, photograph, February 1904, published in The Russo-Japanese War (P. F. Collier & Son, 1904). Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Turning point: the Varyag crippled

Within half an hour the cruiser was in deep trouble. A shell burst near the conning tower and wounded Rudnev; fires broke out on deck and below, one after another. Then a heavy shell struck her on the port side below the waterline, and a stokehold began to flood, giving her a heavy list. Vanner counts five serious hits at or below the waterline and at least five fires.15

How badly her guns were hurt is disputed. The British official history says that all but two of her 6-inch guns were disabled, and Vanner that all twelve were put out of action, their crews without gun shields and exposed to every splinter. Argumenty i Fakty points out that when the Varyag was later raised, all her 6-inch guns were found in place and in working order, so that she could in fact have fought on.16

Rudnev turned back for the anchorage, still firing. The fight had lasted about an hour.17

Scuttled in the harbor

At about 1 p.m. the two ships anchored again. Rudnev decided he could not renew the fight and would not let his ships become Japanese prizes. Boats from the British, French and Italian cruisers took off the wounded and the crews; the Vicksburg sent a doctor and helped with the wounded, but, as both Pavlov and Marshall record, would not take Russian sailors on board. The Korietz was blown up in the afternoon. The Varyag's sea valves were opened and she went down slowly after sunset, burning aft. The Russian steamer Sungari was set on fire and sunk as well.18

The figures for the dead and wounded differ. The British official history gives one officer and 30 men killed, six officers, Rudnev among them, and 85 men seriously wounded, and more than a hundred lightly wounded. The official Russian version, as Argumenty i Fakty sums it up, is 33 killed and 97 wounded; the Great Soviet Encyclopedia gives 122 killed and wounded; Vanner gives 82 killed and 190 wounded of a crew of 570.19

The damage done to the Japanese is disputed too. The Great Soviet Encyclopedia says the Varyag damaged two cruisers and sank a torpedo boat. The Japanese said none of their ships was hit; the British official history reports this and warns that little reliance can be placed on either side's claims, and Argumenty i Fakty was told by a Japanese naval attaché, citing the official Japanese naval history, that the Varyag scored no hits at all.20

Aftermath

The overcrowded neutral cruisers could not keep the wounded for long. Pavlov wrote that gangrene broke out among them; Marshall describes being asked on 12 February to take them and refusing. In the end 24 of the most badly wounded were landed at a hospital in Chemulpo, and the rest of the crews went home by way of neutral ports. In Russia they were greeted as heroes.21

A bare hospital room at Chemulpo, 1904, with wounded men lying on futons on the floor and a Japanese Red Cross nurse in a white uniform and tall cap kneeling among them, in sepia
A Japanese Red Cross nurse among wounded men at Chemulpo, in a photograph by Robert L. Dunn that the Library of Congress catalogs as Russian sailors wounded in the battle of 9 February. The most badly wounded men of the Varyag were landed at a hospital ashore. Robert L. Dunn, Japanese Red Cross nurses at Chemulpo attending Russian soldiers wounded in battle of Feb. 9, photograph, 1904, Library of Congress (detail). Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

For Japan the outcome mattered far more than the gesture: it now held a harbor close to Seoul from the first day of the war. More troops followed. The British official history has the whole 12th Division ashore at Chemulpo by 22 February and on its way to Seoul, and Britannica describes the Japanese First Army landing at Inchon from March for its advance north to the Yalu.22 › Battle of Liaoyang, 1904

Japanese soldiers in heavy winter greatcoats, packs and kepis around a fire basket on a beach at Chemulpo at night, lit by flash, February 1904, in sepia
Japanese soldiers at Chemulpo on a winter night after the naval battle, photographed by flashlight. The landing of 8 and 9 February was the first of many through the following weeks. Robert L. Dunn, Japanese troops landed at Chemulpo after naval battle on Feb. 9th, photograph, 1904, Library of Congress (detail). Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Legacy and memory

The Varyag did not stay on the bottom. The Japanese raised her in 1905 and commissioned her as the Soya. In 1916, with Japan and Russia now allies, Russia bought her back under her old name. She was sent to Britain for repairs in 1917, and after the revolution she never went home: she was sold for scrap and, under tow in 1920, ran aground on the coast of Scotland. A monument to her now stands on that shore; Vanner dates its unveiling to July 2006, Argumenty i Fakty to 2007.23

In Russia the sortie became a legend of defiance. The Soviet encyclopedia called it a heroic battle in which the Varyag damaged two Japanese cruisers, and the version taught for decades, as Argumenty i Fakty sums it up, held that the fight had ended in effect in Russia's favor. Japanese and British records describe a brave but one-sided fight. The war that began at Chemulpo ended in 1905 with Japan's victory, the first by an Asian power over a European one in modern times, in Britannica's words.24 › Battle of Tsushima, 1905

Notes

A number in the text points to a note; each note names the works that paragraph draws on, listed in full under Sources.

  1. Committee of Imperial Defence, “Official History (Naval and Military) of the Russo-Japanese War, vol. 1”; FRUS 1904, Pavlov report, “Mr. McCormick to Mr. Hay, 11 May 1904, with extracts from the report of the Russian minister to Korea, M. Pavloff”; Antoine Vanner, “The Varyag at Chemulpo 1904: A last stand and an unexpected afterlife”. ↩
  2. Committee of Imperial Defence, “Official History (Naval and Military) of the Russo-Japanese War, vol. 1”; Robert D. Neff, “History: Chemulpo and the First Shots of the Russo-Japanese War”; FRUS 1904, Pavlov report, “Mr. McCormick to Mr. Hay, 11 May 1904, with extracts from the report of the Russian minister to Korea, M. Pavloff”. ↩
  3. Britannica, “Russo-Japanese War”; Committee of Imperial Defence, “Official History (Naval and Military) of the Russo-Japanese War, vol. 1”. ↩
  4. Committee of Imperial Defence, “Official History (Naval and Military) of the Russo-Japanese War, vol. 1”; Britannica, “Russo-Japanese War”; Antoine Vanner, “The Varyag at Chemulpo 1904: A last stand and an unexpected afterlife”. ↩
  5. Great Soviet Encyclopedia, “Варяг”; Antoine Vanner, “The Varyag at Chemulpo 1904: A last stand and an unexpected afterlife”; Committee of Imperial Defence, “Official History (Naval and Military) of the Russo-Japanese War, vol. 1”. ↩
  6. Committee of Imperial Defence, “Official History (Naval and Military) of the Russo-Japanese War, vol. 1”; Britannica, “Russo-Japanese War”; Antoine Vanner, “The Varyag at Chemulpo 1904: A last stand and an unexpected afterlife”. ↩
  7. Committee of Imperial Defence, “Official History (Naval and Military) of the Russo-Japanese War, vol. 1”; Antoine Vanner, “The Varyag at Chemulpo 1904: A last stand and an unexpected afterlife”; Great Soviet Encyclopedia, “Варяг”; Argumenty i Fakty, “Дело о «Варяге». Как «АиФ» изменил историю”. ↩
  8. Committee of Imperial Defence, “Official History (Naval and Military) of the Russo-Japanese War, vol. 1”; Great Soviet Encyclopedia, “Варяг”; Antoine Vanner, “The Varyag at Chemulpo 1904: A last stand and an unexpected afterlife”. ↩
  9. Committee of Imperial Defence, “Official History (Naval and Military) of the Russo-Japanese War, vol. 1”; Antoine Vanner, “The Varyag at Chemulpo 1904: A last stand and an unexpected afterlife”; Robert D. Neff, “History: Chemulpo and the First Shots of the Russo-Japanese War”. ↩
  10. Committee of Imperial Defence, “Official History (Naval and Military) of the Russo-Japanese War, vol. 1”; Antoine Vanner, “The Varyag at Chemulpo 1904: A last stand and an unexpected afterlife”. ↩
  11. FRUS 1904, Marshall report, “Mr. Loomis to Mr. McCormick, 22 September 1904, with the report of Commander Marshall of the Vicksburg”; Antoine Vanner, “The Varyag at Chemulpo 1904: A last stand and an unexpected afterlife”. ↩
  12. FRUS 1904, Pavlov report, “Mr. McCormick to Mr. Hay, 11 May 1904, with extracts from the report of the Russian minister to Korea, M. Pavloff”; FRUS 1904, Marshall report, “Mr. Loomis to Mr. McCormick, 22 September 1904, with the report of Commander Marshall of the Vicksburg”; Committee of Imperial Defence, “Official History (Naval and Military) of the Russo-Japanese War, vol. 1”; Antoine Vanner, “The Varyag at Chemulpo 1904: A last stand and an unexpected afterlife”. ↩
  13. FRUS 1904, Pavlov report, “Mr. McCormick to Mr. Hay, 11 May 1904, with extracts from the report of the Russian minister to Korea, M. Pavloff”; Antoine Vanner, “The Varyag at Chemulpo 1904: A last stand and an unexpected afterlife”; Robert D. Neff, “History: Chemulpo and the First Shots of the Russo-Japanese War”. ↩
  14. Committee of Imperial Defence, “Official History (Naval and Military) of the Russo-Japanese War, vol. 1”; Antoine Vanner, “The Varyag at Chemulpo 1904: A last stand and an unexpected afterlife”; Argumenty i Fakty, “Дело о «Варяге». Как «АиФ» изменил историю”. ↩
  15. Committee of Imperial Defence, “Official History (Naval and Military) of the Russo-Japanese War, vol. 1”; Antoine Vanner, “The Varyag at Chemulpo 1904: A last stand and an unexpected afterlife”. ↩
  16. Committee of Imperial Defence, “Official History (Naval and Military) of the Russo-Japanese War, vol. 1”; Antoine Vanner, “The Varyag at Chemulpo 1904: A last stand and an unexpected afterlife”; Argumenty i Fakty, “Дело о «Варяге». Как «АиФ» изменил историю”. ↩
  17. Committee of Imperial Defence, “Official History (Naval and Military) of the Russo-Japanese War, vol. 1”; Robert D. Neff, “History: Chemulpo and the First Shots of the Russo-Japanese War”; Antoine Vanner, “The Varyag at Chemulpo 1904: A last stand and an unexpected afterlife”. ↩
  18. FRUS 1904, Pavlov report, “Mr. McCormick to Mr. Hay, 11 May 1904, with extracts from the report of the Russian minister to Korea, M. Pavloff”; FRUS 1904, Marshall report, “Mr. Loomis to Mr. McCormick, 22 September 1904, with the report of Commander Marshall of the Vicksburg”; Committee of Imperial Defence, “Official History (Naval and Military) of the Russo-Japanese War, vol. 1”; Robert D. Neff, “History: Chemulpo and the First Shots of the Russo-Japanese War”. ↩
  19. Committee of Imperial Defence, “Official History (Naval and Military) of the Russo-Japanese War, vol. 1”; Argumenty i Fakty, “Дело о «Варяге». Как «АиФ» изменил историю”; Great Soviet Encyclopedia, “Варяг”; Antoine Vanner, “The Varyag at Chemulpo 1904: A last stand and an unexpected afterlife”. ↩
  20. Great Soviet Encyclopedia, “Варяг”; Committee of Imperial Defence, “Official History (Naval and Military) of the Russo-Japanese War, vol. 1”; Argumenty i Fakty, “Дело о «Варяге». Как «АиФ» изменил историю”. ↩
  21. FRUS 1904, Pavlov report, “Mr. McCormick to Mr. Hay, 11 May 1904, with extracts from the report of the Russian minister to Korea, M. Pavloff”; FRUS 1904, Marshall report, “Mr. Loomis to Mr. McCormick, 22 September 1904, with the report of Commander Marshall of the Vicksburg”; Committee of Imperial Defence, “Official History (Naval and Military) of the Russo-Japanese War, vol. 1”; Robert D. Neff, “History: Chemulpo and the First Shots of the Russo-Japanese War”; Great Soviet Encyclopedia, “Варяг”; Antoine Vanner, “The Varyag at Chemulpo 1904: A last stand and an unexpected afterlife”. ↩
  22. Committee of Imperial Defence, “Official History (Naval and Military) of the Russo-Japanese War, vol. 1”; Britannica, “Russo-Japanese War”. ↩
  23. Great Soviet Encyclopedia, “Варяг”; Antoine Vanner, “The Varyag at Chemulpo 1904: A last stand and an unexpected afterlife”; Argumenty i Fakty, “Дело о «Варяге». Как «АиФ» изменил историю”. ↩
  24. Great Soviet Encyclopedia, “Варяг”; Argumenty i Fakty, “Дело о «Варяге». Как «АиФ» изменил историю”; Committee of Imperial Defence, “Official History (Naval and Military) of the Russo-Japanese War, vol. 1”; Britannica, “Russo-Japanese War”. ↩

Sources

Frequently asked questions

When was the Battle of Chemulpo Bay?

On 9 February 1904 (27 January in the Russian calendar then in use), off Chemulpo, today Incheon, on the west coast of Korea. The first shots had been exchanged the day before.

Who fought at Chemulpo?

A Japanese squadron under Rear Admiral Uriu Sotokichi, led by the armored cruiser Asama, against the Russian cruiser Varyag and gunboat Korietz under Captain Vsevolod Rudnev.

Why did the Varyag sail out to fight?

Uriu gave the Russian ships until noon to leave the neutral port or be attacked in harbor, and the neutral captains could only protest. Rudnev chose to fight his way out rather than surrender his ships or be sunk at anchor.

How many Russians died at Chemulpo?

Figures differ. The British official history gives 31 killed, 91 seriously wounded and over a hundred lightly wounded; the official Russian version 33 killed and 97 wounded; other accounts give more.

Did the Varyag hit any Japanese ships?

The Great Soviet Encyclopedia claims two cruisers damaged and a torpedo boat sunk, but the Japanese reported no hits, and a Japanese naval attaché citing the official Japanese naval history told Argumenty i Fakty the same.

What happened to the Varyag afterward?

The Japanese raised her in 1905 and used her as the Soya. Russia bought her back in 1916; she went to Britain for repairs, was sold for scrap after the revolution and ran aground off Scotland in 1920.

Why did Chemulpo matter?

It gave Japan a safe landing place close to Seoul at the very start of the war, and Japanese armies used the port to land troops for the advance into northern Korea and Manchuria.

Battle honors of your homeland

The turning points of history

Marathon, Gaugamela, Cannae, Constantinople, Waterloo, Stalingrad: the days the world changed course.

Based on your country, which we do not store · why? ·

Break out of Chemulpo

Echoes of Battle brings the great battles of history to life, scene by scene on the real map. Enlist below and we will send word to your inbox the day it launches.

Or supply the campaign on Ko-fi ›