Who was the better general, Eisenhower or Montgomery?
It depends on what you measure. Eisenhower was the greater coalition commander and strategist, who held a fractious alliance together and carried it to victory. Montgomery, the victor of El Alamein, was the finer battlefield general of the two, but his certainty and demands strained the alliance and made him as much a problem as an asset to his chief.
They were the two names most tied to the Western Allied victory, and they did not always get on. Dwight Eisenhower held the Allied coalition together as supreme commander; Bernard Montgomery commanded its armies in the field and never hid his belief that he should have had more. Partners in victory, rivals in temperament. Here they are, side by side.
Head to head
| Dwight Eisenhower | Bernard Montgomery | |
|---|---|---|
| Lived | 1890 to 19691 | 1887 to 19762 |
| Role | Supreme Allied Commander | British field marshal and army group commander |
| Famous for | Commanding the D-Day invasion | El Alamein and the Normandy ground battle |
| Strength | Coalition leadership and broad strategy | Set-piece battles and careful preparation |
| Great test | Holding the alliance together to victory | Beating Rommel, then commanding in Normandy |
| Friction | Overruled Montgomery's single-thrust plan | Pushed for ground command and a narrow front |
| After the war | 34th President of the United States3 | Celebrated, and often criticized, field marshal |
Eisenhower: the man who held the alliance together
Dwight Eisenhower was not a battlefield general in the usual sense: his genius lay in making a vast coalition work. As Supreme Allied Commander he launched the D-Day landings in 1944 and managed the egos, armies and governments of the alliance all the way to Germany, favoring a broad advance on a wide front. He later served two terms as president of the United States.4

Montgomery: the field commander who beat Rommel
Bernard Montgomery was the most celebrated British field commander of the war, the victor of El Alamein who led the Allied ground forces on D-Day. Careful and supremely confident, he repeatedly pressed Eisenhower for overall ground command and for a single concentrated thrust into Germany, a confidence that won battles but strained the alliance. On 1 September 1944 Eisenhower took direct command of the land battle, a change Montgomery had argued against; his promotion to field marshal was announced the same day, but he was left at the head of his own army group. That month Eisenhower agreed to his plan for a narrow thrust, Operation Market Garden, but it failed at Arnhem and the Allies went back to the broad front. Montgomery's press conference of 7 January 1945, after the Ardennes fighting, praised the American soldier but offended Bradley and other American commanders by its tone, and Eisenhower later recalled it as causing him more distress than any similar incident of the war.5

The verdict
They were not rivals for the same victory but partners in different roles, and the comparison is really about two kinds of leadership. Eisenhower was the greater commander in the largest sense, the man who held a fractious coalition together and carried it to victory; Montgomery was the finer battlefield general of the two, but his certainty and his demands made him as much a problem as an asset to his chief. The alliance needed both, and it needed Eisenhower to manage Montgomery.

Compare more in Patton vs Montgomery, Montgomery vs Rommel and Patton vs Rommel, or meet the field in the greatest military commanders.
About this comparison
Each commander above has a full biography on this site, with its own sources. Judgments of who was "greater" are ours and openly a matter of debate; the facts and dates follow established histories. See our editorial policy.






