PLEnlist

17 February in military history: Battle of Miani, 1843

Military history · 17 February · British conquest of SindhFull calendar

Black and white halftone of the Battle of Miani: in the foreground British infantrymen with bayonets fight at close quarters with Baluch warriors carrying round shields and swords, a fallen white horse among them, while mounted officers watch from higher ground on the left and smoke drifts over a low ridge.
“Battle of Miani on Feb. 17, 1843, between Napier's force and the Baluchis,” a halftone illustration printed in The Book of History about 1915 to 1921. Public domain. Illustration from The Book of History, edited by James Bryce and others (New York and London, about 1915 to 1921), via the Internet Archive.
Quick answer

On 17 February 1843 an East India Company army under General Charles Napier defeated the army of the Talpur Amirs of Sindh at Miani, near Hyderabad in present-day Pakistan. Napier's small force held the bank of a dry riverbed against wave after wave of Baluch warriors. A second victory, at Dubba in March, completed the conquest of Sindh.

Battle of Miani

17 February 1843 · 183 years ago

A quarrel turned into a war

Sindh, the lower Indus valley, was ruled by the Talpur Amirs, and by the early 1840s the East India Company had long been pressing on it. The Company sent General Charles Napier to deal with the Amirs. The Royal Collection Trust's catalog calls the rising he was meant to forestall an imagined one, and the historian Edward Rice describes Napier as goading the Amirs into war.1

Fighting broke out in mid-February 1843, and Napier marched against the Amirs' army near Hyderabad. On 17 February he found it drawn up at Miani, about six miles from the city, behind the high bank of the Fuleli, a river channel whose bed was then dry. Ali Murad of Khairpur, a rival of his elder brother Mir Rustam, stayed on the British side.2

The fight at the riverbank

The numbers are uncertain. Napier reported about 2,800 men of all arms and twelve guns, and Edward Rice gives the same 2,800, while the Royal Collection Trust says about 3,000. The core of Napier's force was one British regiment, the 22nd (Cheshire) Regiment of Foot, with several units of Indian soldiers. Napier put the Talpur army at 22,000 men, a figure Rice repeats, while the Royal Collection Trust's catalog gives 8,000.3

The Talpur army was made up largely of Baluch warriors armed with matchlocks, swords and shields, with a large body of horsemen. Wave after wave charged the British line along the bank and was cut down by musket, bayonet and artillery fire. In the end the Talpur army broke, and the Amirs gave themselves up.4

The cost and the conquest

The casualty figures are disputed. Napier's dispatch gave British losses of 256 killed and wounded and said the enemy was generally supposed to have lost 5,000 men. The Royal Collection Trust's catalog gives about 5,000 Talpur dead and British casualties of about 260, and Edward Rice about 6,000 Talpur dead or wounded.5

Hyderabad surrendered and was in British hands within days. On 24 March 1843 Napier defeated a second Talpur army under Mir Sher Muhammad at Dubba, near Hyderabad. Sindh was then annexed to British India.6

The pun Napier never sent

In Britain, Miani is best remembered for a joke. Napier was said to have reported his conquest in a single Latin word, “Peccavi,” meaning “I have sinned”, a pun on “I have Sindh”. Euronews says that Napier never sent such a message, and Edward Rice describes the word as the caption of a cartoon in the humor magazine Punch.7

The joke stuck because many in Britain thought the conquest really was a sin: Napier had been sent to stop a rising, not to take the whole province. The Company's next wars on the Indus, against the Sikh kingdom of the Punjab, are the subject of our article on Chillianwala, and the wider story is in our guide to the battles of India.8

Battle of Eupatoria, 1855: Omer Pasha holds the Crimean port

17 February 1855 · 171 years ago

Russian forces attacked the Crimean port of Eupatoria, held mainly by Ottoman troops allied with Britain and France, during the Crimean War. The assault was beaten back, and the Russians failed to take the town.

Read the full story of Battle of Eupatoria, 1855: Omer Pasha holds the Crimean port ›

Frequently asked questions

What happened at Miani on 17 February 1843?

An East India Company army under Charles Napier defeated the army of the Talpur Amirs of Sindh at Miani near Hyderabad. With a second victory at Dubba in March, it opened the way to the British annexation of Sindh.

Did Napier really send the message “Peccavi”?

Probably not. The pun, Latin for “I have sinned” and so “I have Sindh,” is traced to the humor magazine Punch, not to a real dispatch.

How large were the armies at Miani?

The sources differ. Napier's force is given as about 2,800 to 3,000 men. Estimates of the Talpur army run from 8,000 to 22,000.

How many men were killed at Miani?

The figures are disputed. Napier reported 256 British killed and wounded, and the Royal Collection Trust gives about 260. Napier and the Royal Collection Trust both put the Talpur losses at about 5,000 men, Edward Rice at about 6,000 dead or wounded.

Notes

A number in the text points to a note; each note names the works that paragraph draws on, listed in full under Sources.

  1. Royal Collection Trust, “The Battle of Meeanee, 17 February 1843”; Edward Rice, “General Charles Napier and the Conquest of Sind”. ↩
  2. Edward Rice, “General Charles Napier and the Conquest of Sind”; The London Gazette, issue 20222, 9 May 1843; Royal Collection Trust, “The Battle of Meeanee, 17 February 1843”. ↩
  3. Royal Collection Trust, “The Battle of Meeanee, 17 February 1843”; Edward Rice, “General Charles Napier and the Conquest of Sind”; The London Gazette, issue 20222, 9 May 1843. ↩
  4. Royal Collection Trust, “The Battle of Meeanee, 17 February 1843”; The London Gazette, issue 20222, 9 May 1843; Edward Rice, “General Charles Napier and the Conquest of Sind”. ↩
  5. The London Gazette, issue 20222, 9 May 1843; Royal Collection Trust, “The Battle of Meeanee, 17 February 1843”; Edward Rice, “General Charles Napier and the Conquest of Sind”. ↩
  6. Royal Collection Trust, “The Battle of Meeanee, 17 February 1843”; Edward Rice, “General Charles Napier and the Conquest of Sind”; The London Gazette, issue 20222, 9 May 1843. ↩
  7. Edward Rice, “General Charles Napier and the Conquest of Sind”; Euronews, “Culture Re-View”. ↩
  8. Royal Collection Trust, “The Battle of Meeanee, 17 February 1843”; Euronews, “Culture Re-View”. ↩

Sources

Battle honors of your homeland

The turning points of history

Marathon, Gaugamela, Cannae, Constantinople, Waterloo, Stalingrad: the days the world changed course.

Based on your country, which we do not store · why? ·

Relive the great battles

Echoes of Battle brings the great battles of history to life, scene by scene on the real map. Enlist below and we will send word to your inbox the day it launches.

Or supply the campaign on Ko-fi ›