PLEnlist

9 January in military history: Battle of Villersexel, 1871

Military history · 9 January · Franco-Prussian WarFull calendar

Black and white reproduction of a painting: French soldiers in a snowy village street drag carts and bundles of brushwood toward a burning house, firing at windows, with dead and wounded lying in the snow.
The fighting at Villersexel, 9 January 1871, in a painting by Alphonse de Neuville, reproduced in Colonel Rousset's history of the Franco-German War (1911). French infantry fight their way back into the village in the snow. Public domain. Alphonse de Neuville, before 1885, via Wikimedia Commons.
Quick answer

On 9 January 1871 General August von Werder's German corps attacked the French Army of the East under General Charles Bourbaki at Villersexel, in eastern France. The Germans had to give up the town, and the French counted it a success, but the fight delayed Bourbaki's march to relieve the besieged fortress of Belfort.

Bourbaki's march east

By the winter of 1870 the Franco-Prussian War was going badly for France. The emperor's army had surrendered at Sedan, and Paris was under siege. In the east the fortress of Belfort, besieged by the Germans since early November, was still holding out.1

The government sent a new army, the Army of the East under General Charles Bourbaki, to relieve Belfort and then to strike at the German lines of communication. Friedrich Engels, who followed the war as a military commentator for the London <cite>Pall Mall Gazette</cite>, called the move the most promising any French general had made in the war, provided it was carried out with full force. Facing Bourbaki was General August von Werder's XIV Corps.2

The fight at Villersexel

Werder chose to attack the French flank at Villersexel rather than simply race them to Belfort, and on 9 January his troops went in. By the end of the day the Germans had to give up the positions they had taken in the town, and the French counted the fight a success.3

Accounts of what it meant differ. Engels, writing on 14 January, noted that both sides claimed the victory and judged it a rearguard action that let Werder get his troops away. A history of Garibaldi's campaign published by the Italian Ministry of Defense argues that Werder got exactly what he wanted, because the fight stopped Bourbaki for several days. The French engineers' museum makes the same point: the Army of the East moved so slowly that the Germans had time to build a strong defensive line on the Lisaine River, between Bourbaki and Belfort.4

We found no casualty figures for the battle in two independent sources, so none are given here.

The Lisaine and the retreat

In mid-January the Army of the East attacked Werder's line on the Lisaine. After three days of fighting it had to break off, and Belfort was not relieved. As a German army under General Edwin von Manteuffel came up on its flank, the demoralized French army fell back and was pushed toward the Swiss border.5

In the despair of the retreat Bourbaki tried to shoot himself, and command passed to General Justin Clinchant. Rather than let his army go into German captivity, Clinchant asked Switzerland to intern it.6

Internment in Switzerland

From 1 to 3 February 1871 about 87,000 French soldiers crossed into Switzerland at Les Verrières and other points in the Jura, and laid down their arms. The Swiss spread them across the country and gave them food, shelter and medical care.7

The crossing is still remembered in Lucerne, where a panorama painting of it by Edouard Castres, finished in 1881, is on display.8

Frequently asked questions

Who won the Battle of Villersexel?

The Germans had to give up the town, and French accounts count it as a success. Engels noted at the time that both sides claimed the victory, and some historians argue that Werder gained more, because the battle delayed Bourbaki.

Why was Bourbaki marching east?

To relieve the besieged fortress of Belfort and then to strike at the German lines of communication.

What happened to the Army of the East?

It attacked Werder's line on the Lisaine in mid-January 1871 without relieving Belfort, retreated toward Switzerland and was interned there from 1 to 3 February 1871, about 87,000 men in all.

How many French soldiers were interned in Switzerland?

About 87,000. They crossed the border at Les Verrières and other points in the Jura from 1 to 3 February 1871 and were disarmed.

Notes

A number in the text points to a note; each note names the works that paragraph draws on, listed in full under Sources.

  1. Musée du Génie, “Le siège de Belfort 1870-1871”; Bourbaki Panorama Luzern, “History”; H. de Weck, “Bourbakiarmee”. ↩
  2. Musée du Génie, “Le siège de Belfort 1870-1871”; Bourbaki Panorama Luzern, “History”; F. Engels, The Pall Mall Gazette. ↩
  3. F. Engels, The Pall Mall Gazette; Italian Ministry of Defense, General Giuseppe Garibaldi; Musée du Génie, “Le siège de Belfort 1870-1871”; Bourbaki Panorama Luzern, “History”. ↩
  4. F. Engels, The Pall Mall Gazette; Italian Ministry of Defense, General Giuseppe Garibaldi; Musée du Génie, “Le siège de Belfort 1870-1871”. ↩
  5. Musée du Génie, “Le siège de Belfort 1870-1871”; Bourbaki Panorama Luzern, “History”; H. de Weck, “Bourbakiarmee”. ↩
  6. Bourbaki Panorama Luzern, “History”; H. de Weck, “Bourbakiarmee”. ↩
  7. Bourbaki Panorama Luzern, “History”; H. de Weck, “Bourbakiarmee”. ↩
  8. Bourbaki Panorama Luzern, “History”; H. de Weck, “Bourbakiarmee”. ↩

Sources

Battle honors of your homeland

The turning points of history

Marathon, Gaugamela, Cannae, Constantinople, Waterloo, Stalingrad: the days the world changed course.

Based on your country, which we do not store · why? ·

Relive the great battles

Echoes of Battle brings the great battles of history to life, scene by scene on the real map. Enlist below and we will send word to your inbox the day it launches.

Or supply the campaign on Ko-fi ›