PLEnlist

7 July in military history: Marco Polo Bridge Incident, 1937

Military history · 7 July · Second Sino-Japanese WarFull calendar

Map marking the battle site: Marco Polo Bridge (Lugouqiao) and Wanping, southwest of Beijing, China
Location: Marco Polo Bridge (Lugouqiao) and Wanping, southwest of Beijing, China. Location map: © Echoes of Battle (data: Natural Earth, public domain)
Quick answer

Late on 7 July 1937 Japanese troops on night maneuvers near the Marco Polo Bridge, outside Peiping (now Beijing), clashed with Chinese troops of the 29th Army. Each side blamed the other, and the incident grew into a full-scale war between China and Japan. On 7 July 1944 the Japanese made a mass attack on Saipan.

Marco Polo Bridge incident

7 July 1937 · 89 years ago

North China in 1937

Japan kept troops in North China under the Protocol of 1901 between China and the powers and the agreements that followed it. On the night of 7 July a detachment of Japanese troops from Fengtai, near Peiping, now Beijing, was holding night maneuvers near the Marco Polo Bridge, or Lukouchiao. Chinese troops of the 29th Army were stationed at the bridge and in the nearby walled town of Wanping.1

Even the right to hold maneuvers there was disputed. The Japanese Embassy in Washington said the right was set out in a Sino-Japanese protocol of 1902 and that the Chinese had been told of the maneuver in advance; the Chinese Embassy wrote that the maneuvers were not permissible even under the Protocol of 1901; the US Embassy in Peiping judged the Japanese claim ill-founded.2

A shot in the dark

Shortly before midnight shots were fired near the bridge. Who fired them was disputed from the start: "The Chinese and Japanese versions of the incident differ," the League of Nations committee wrote in October.3

In the Japanese version, Chinese troops of the 29th Army opened fire on the Japanese soldiers; the Japanese Embassy in Washington added that they did so "for no cause at all".4

In the Chinese version, the Japanese reported a soldier missing and demanded entry to Wanping to search the town; when they were refused, they attacked it. Chinese officials added that the missing soldier had in fact come back. The Chinese Embassy in Washington wrote that Japanese troops "suddenly opened an attack on the city of Wanping".5

The fighting flared again on the morning of 8 July, while negotiators were in Wanping, and again each side blamed the other.6

Planned or not?

Each side accused the other of planning it. On 11 July the Japanese government blamed unlawful firing by the 29th Army in the middle of the night of 7 July, and the cabinet called the incident, beyond any room for doubt, a premeditated armed anti-Japanese action by the Chinese side (our translation). A Chinese Foreign Office official told the US Embassy on 9 July that the incident was "clearly premeditated by the Japanese", and Chiang Kai-shek said in his Kuling address that "it can easily be seen that the Lukouchiao incident is not a sudden and accidental development".7

Neither the League committee nor the US Embassy in Peiping tried to settle who fired first. The League set the two versions side by side, and the embassy, reporting in August, wrote: "Presumably it will never be established whether a Japanese or a Chinese fired the shot which precipitated the fighting in the vicinity of Marco Polo Bridge".8

From incident to war

On 11 July a local settlement was signed. The same day the Japanese cabinet decided to reinforce its army in North China with units from the Kwantung Army in Manchuria and from Korea and to send more from Japan, while still declaring a policy of not enlarging the incident (our translation).9

The settlement did not hold. Fighting spread to the outskirts of Peiping, and by the end of July the 29th Army had withdrawn from the Peiping and Tientsin area and the Japanese held both cities. The clash grew into a full-scale war between China and Japan.10

For decades China dated its war of resistance from 7 July 1937. In January 2017 its Ministry of Education ordered textbooks to date it from 18 September 1931, the Mukden incident, making it a fourteen-year war. The attack on Pearl Harbor, which brought the United States into the war against Japan, is told in our article on the attack.11

Also on this day

Battle of Peritheorion

7 July 1345 · 681 years ago

Before the walls of Peritheorion in Thrace, the Bulgarian brigand ruler Momchil faced a Byzantine and Turkish army allied to John VI Kantakouzenos, amid the Byzantine civil war. Pinned against the town walls, Momchil's men were crushed and he himself was killed.

1944: early in the morning on Saipan the Japanese launched a mass banzai attack down the Tanapag plain against the 1st and 2d Battalions of the US 105th Infantry. Lieutenant Colonel William J. O'Brien, commanding the 1st Battalion, was killed and posthumously awarded the Medal of Honor. A count made for the 27th Division found 4,311 Japanese dead in the area of the attack; Crowl notes that some of them had been killed earlier by naval gunfire or artillery. The landing on Saipan is told on our 15 June page.12

Frequently asked questions

What was the Marco Polo Bridge Incident?

A clash between Japanese troops on night maneuvers and Chinese troops of the 29th Army near the Marco Polo Bridge (Lukouchiao) and the walled town of Wanping, outside Peiping (Beijing), late on 7 July 1937. The fighting flared again on the morning of 8 July.

Who fired first at the Marco Polo Bridge?

The two sides gave opposite accounts. Japanese officials said Chinese troops opened fire on Japanese soldiers; Chinese officials said the Japanese demanded entry to Wanping to search for a missing soldier, were refused and then attacked. The US Embassy in Peiping wrote in August 1937 that it would presumably never be established who fired the first shot.

Did either side say the incident was planned?

Both did, each blaming the other. On 11 July the Japanese government called it a premeditated armed anti-Japanese action by the Chinese side, while a Chinese Foreign Office official called it clearly premeditated by the Japanese.

How did the incident become a war?

A local settlement was signed on 11 July, but the same day the Japanese cabinet decided to send reinforcements to North China from Manchuria, Korea and Japan. By the end of July the Japanese held Peiping and Tientsin, and the clash grew into a full-scale war between China and Japan.

What happened on Saipan on 7 July 1944?

Early on 7 July the Japanese launched a mass banzai attack down the Tanapag plain against the 1st and 2d Battalions of the US 105th Infantry. A count made for the 27th Division found 4,311 Japanese dead in the area of the attack.

Notes

A number in the text points to a note; each note names the works that paragraph draws on, listed in full under Sources.

  1. Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States, “The Japanese Embassy to the Department of State”; Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States, “First Report Adopted by the League of Nations Assembly on October 6, 1937”; Foreign Relations of the United States, “The Chinese Embassy to the Department of State”; Foreign Relations of the United States, “The Ambassador in China (Johnson) to the Secretary of State”; Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States, “The Ambassador in China (Johnson) to the Secretary of State”. ↩
  2. Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States, “The Japanese Embassy to the Department of State”; Foreign Relations of the United States, “The Chinese Embassy to the Department of State”; Foreign Relations of the United States, “The Ambassador in China (Johnson) to the Secretary of State”. ↩
  3. Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States, “The Japanese Embassy to the Department of State”; Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States, “The Ambassador in China (Johnson) to the Secretary of State”; Foreign Relations of the United States, “The Counselor of Embassy in China (Peck) to the Secretary of State”; Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States, “First Report Adopted by the League of Nations Assembly on October 6, 1937”; Foreign Relations of the United States, “The Ambassador in China (Johnson) to the Secretary of State”. ↩
  4. Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States, “The Japanese Embassy to the Department of State”; Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States, “First Report Adopted by the League of Nations Assembly on October 6, 1937”; Japanese Government, “華北派兵に關する聲明”. ↩
  5. Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States, “First Report Adopted by the League of Nations Assembly on October 6, 1937”; Foreign Relations of the United States, “The Ambassador in China (Johnson) to the Secretary of State”; Foreign Relations of the United States, “The Counselor of Embassy in China (Peck) to the Secretary of State”; Foreign Relations of the United States, “The Chinese Embassy to the Department of State”. ↩
  6. Foreign Relations of the United States, “The Ambassador in China (Johnson) to the Secretary of State”; Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States, “The Ambassador in China (Johnson) to the Secretary of State”; Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States, “The Ambassador in Japan (Grew) to the Secretary of State”. ↩
  7. Japanese Government, “華北派兵に關する聲明”; Japanese Cabinet, “蘆溝橋事件處理に關する閣議決定”; Foreign Relations of the United States, “The Counselor of Embassy in China (Peck) to the Secretary of State”; Foreign Relations of the United States, “The Counselor of Embassy in China (Peck) to the Secretary of State”. ↩
  8. Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States, “First Report Adopted by the League of Nations Assembly on October 6, 1937”; Foreign Relations of the United States, “The Ambassador in China (Johnson) to the Secretary of State”. ↩
  9. Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States, “First Report Adopted by the League of Nations Assembly on October 6, 1937”; Foreign Relations of the United States, “The Ambassador in China (Johnson) to the Secretary of State”; Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States, “The Japanese Embassy to the Department of State”; Foreign Relations of the United States, “The Chinese Embassy to the Department of State”; Japanese Cabinet, “蘆溝橋事件處理に關する閣議決定”. ↩
  10. Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States, “First Report Adopted by the League of Nations Assembly on October 6, 1937”; Foreign Relations of the United States, “The Chinese Embassy to the Department of State”; Foreign Relations of the United States, “The Ambassador in China (Johnson) to the Secretary of State”; Office of the Historian, “Japan, China, the United States and the Road to Pearl Harbor, 1937-41”; Japan Center for Asian Historical Records, “July 7, 1937”. ↩
  11. Keith Huxen, “History Through the Viewfinder”; Chen Shaoyuan and Li Rongde, “China’s History Textbooks Told to Modify Date War Began Against Japan”; Sun Xiaochen, “Texts to recognize entire war of resistance”. ↩
  12. Philip A. Crowl, “Campaign in the Marianas”; Carl W. Hoffman, “Saipan”. ↩

Sources

Battle honors of your homeland

The turning points of history

Marathon, Gaugamela, Cannae, Constantinople, Waterloo, Stalingrad: the days the world changed course.

Based on your country, which we do not store · why? ·

Relive the great battles

Echoes of Battle brings the great battles of history to life, scene by scene on the real map. Enlist below and we will send word to your inbox the day it launches.

Or supply the campaign on Ko-fi ›