PLEnlist

18 March in military history: Battle of Neerwinden, 1793

Military history · 18 March · War of the First CoalitionFull calendar

Print of the Battle of Neerwinden, dated 1794 to 1807: horsemen clash with sabers in the foreground amid fallen soldiers, while smoke rises beside a town with a tall church spire and lines of troops cross the rolling fields behind.
"Veldslag met de Oostenrijkers, bij Neerwinden, op den 18den van Lentemaand 1793", a print by Reinier Vinkeles and Daniël Vrijdag after a drawing by Jacques François Joseph Swebach, dated 1794 to 1807 by the Rijksmuseum. Public domain. Reinier Vinkeles and Daniël Vrijdag after Jacques François Joseph Swebach, Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam (RP-P-OB-86.226).
Quick answer

On 18 March 1793 General Dumouriez attacked the Austrian army of the Prince of Coburg at Neerwinden, in what is now Belgium. His right and center held their ground, but his left under Miranda broke, and the French were beaten. Within three weeks Dumouriez had lost Belgium and gone over to the Austrians. In 1871 the Paris Commune rising began.

Battle of Neerwinden

18 March 1793 · 233 years ago

Back from Holland

Early in 1793 Dumouriez was in Holland while General Francisco de Miranda besieged Maastricht. On 1 March the Austrians crossed the Roer and beat the French at Aldenhoven, and Miranda had to raise the siege.1

Dumouriez hurried back and rejoined the army at Louvain in mid-March. On 16 March the two armies clashed at Tirlemont. Coburg's army then stood behind the Little Gete, with Archduke Charles and the advance guard on its right and Clerfayt on its left.2

Eight columns

Dumouriez split his army into eight columns: Valence led the right, the duc de Chartres the center and Miranda the left. The columns moved off early in the morning, and the firing began around seven.3

On the right the village of Neerwinden was taken and lost several times, and the Austrians held it by evening. Valence was wounded leading the cavalry against the Austrian horse. At nightfall the fight on the right and in the center was still undecided.4

The left gives way

On the left the French took Dormael, but the Austrians retook it, and Archduke Charles then sent his infantry and cavalry against Ruault's division, which broke. The volunteers ran and left the regular troops in the lurch. Guiscard, who commanded the artillery, was killed.5

Miranda fell back to Tirlemont. Dumouriez learned of it only at night, rode to his left and found Miranda in Tirlemont.6

Who lost it?

Dumouriez blamed Miranda: had he held the line of the Gete, the battle would have been won. The military historian Jomini called that charge unjust, and Coburg's biographer Witzleben called it far-fetched. In the view of the historian Arthur Chuquet, Miranda was beaten because he could not carry his soldiers with him, and Neerwinden decided the loss of Belgium as Jemappes had decided its conquest.7

Counting men and losses

The French had between about 40,000 and 48,000 men, depending on the source, and the Austrians between about 32,000 and 43,000, with more cavalry. The French lost about 4,000 men and 30 guns. Coburg's army lost 97 officers and 2,747 men.8

From retreat to defection

On 19 March Dumouriez withdrew his right and center back over the Gete. Thousands of volunteers deserted. On 24 March the army evacuated Brussels. Dumouriez opened talks with Coburg's chief of staff, Colonel Mack, and planned to march on Paris and restore the monarchy.9

At the beginning of April the war minister Beurnonville and four deputies of the Convention came to his headquarters at Saint-Amand to summon him, and Dumouriez had them arrested and handed over to the Austrians. The army would not follow him, and on 5 April he went over to the Austrians. Valence and the duc de Chartres, the future King Louis-Philippe, went with him. For the autumn campaign of 1793, see our article on the Battle of Wattignies.10

Operation Menu, 1969: the secret bombing of Cambodia

18 March 1969 · 57 years ago

Operation Menu was a secret American B-52 bombing campaign over eastern Cambodia during the Vietnam War, aimed at North Vietnamese and Viet Cong bases near the South Vietnamese border. Its effect on the Khmer Rouge, the North Vietnamese and Cambodian civilians is disputed.

Read the full story of Operation Menu, 1969: the secret bombing of Cambodia ›

Also on this day

1871: before dawn, General Vinoy's troops moved to seize the National Guard's cannon on Montmartre in Paris. Crowds surrounded the troops, soldiers of the 88th went over to them, and General Lecomte was arrested. Late in the afternoon Lecomte and General Clément Thomas were shot in a house in the rue des Rosiers. The day began the rising of the Paris Commune.11

Frequently asked questions

Who won the Battle of Neerwinden in 1793?

The Austrian army of the Prince of Coburg. The French right and center held their own until nightfall, but Miranda's left wing broke and fell back to Tirlemont, and Dumouriez withdrew over the Gete the next day.

How many soldiers fought at Neerwinden?

The sources differ: between about 40,000 and 48,000 French against between about 32,000 and 43,000 Austrians, who were stronger in cavalry.

What were the losses at Neerwinden?

The French lost about 4,000 men and 30 guns; Coburg's army lost 97 officers and 2,747 men.

Who was to blame for the French defeat?

Dumouriez blamed Miranda for retreating. Jomini called that unjust and Witzleben far-fetched; Chuquet writes that Miranda could not carry his soldiers with him.

What happened to Dumouriez after Neerwinden?

He gave up Belgium, negotiated with the Austrians, arrested the war minister and four deputies sent to summon him, failed to win over his army and went over to the Austrians on 5 April 1793.

Notes

A number in the text points to a note; each note names the works that paragraph draws on, listed in full under Sources.

  1. A. von Witzleben, “Prinz Friedrich Josias von Coburg-Saalfeld, Herzog zu Sachsen”; Arthur Chuquet, “La trahison de Dumouriez”; Ramsay Weston Phipps, “The Armies of the First French Republic and the Rise of the Marshals of Napoleon I”; k.k. Kriegs-Archiv, “Oesterreichische militärische Zeitschrift”. ↩
  2. A. von Witzleben, “Prinz Friedrich Josias von Coburg-Saalfeld, Herzog zu Sachsen”; Ramsay Weston Phipps, “The Armies of the First French Republic and the Rise of the Marshals of Napoleon I”; Antoine-Henri Jomini, “Histoire critique et militaire des guerres de la Révolution”. ↩
  3. Ramsay Weston Phipps, “The Armies of the First French Republic and the Rise of the Marshals of Napoleon I”; Antoine-Henri Jomini, “Histoire critique et militaire des guerres de la Révolution”; Charles-François Dumouriez, “Mémoires du général Dumouriez, écrits par lui-même”; A. von Witzleben, “Prinz Friedrich Josias von Coburg-Saalfeld, Herzog zu Sachsen”; Arthur Chuquet, “La trahison de Dumouriez”. ↩
  4. Arthur Chuquet, “La trahison de Dumouriez”; Charles-François Dumouriez, “Mémoires du général Dumouriez, écrits par lui-même”; “Réimpression de l’ancien Moniteur”; A. von Witzleben, “Prinz Friedrich Josias von Coburg-Saalfeld, Herzog zu Sachsen”. ↩
  5. A. von Witzleben, “Prinz Friedrich Josias von Coburg-Saalfeld, Herzog zu Sachsen”; Arthur Chuquet, “La trahison de Dumouriez”; Charles-François Dumouriez, “Mémoires du général Dumouriez, écrits par lui-même”; Antoine-Henri Jomini, “Histoire critique et militaire des guerres de la Révolution”. ↩
  6. A. von Witzleben, “Prinz Friedrich Josias von Coburg-Saalfeld, Herzog zu Sachsen”; Arthur Chuquet, “La trahison de Dumouriez”; Charles-François Dumouriez, “Mémoires du général Dumouriez, écrits par lui-même”. ↩
  7. A. von Witzleben, “Prinz Friedrich Josias von Coburg-Saalfeld, Herzog zu Sachsen”; Antoine-Henri Jomini, “Histoire critique et militaire des guerres de la Révolution”; Charles-François Dumouriez, “Mémoires du général Dumouriez, écrits par lui-même”; Arthur Chuquet, “La trahison de Dumouriez”. ↩
  8. A. von Witzleben, “Prinz Friedrich Josias von Coburg-Saalfeld, Herzog zu Sachsen”; Arthur Chuquet, “La trahison de Dumouriez”; Ramsay Weston Phipps, “The Armies of the First French Republic and the Rise of the Marshals of Napoleon I”; k.k. Kriegs-Archiv, “Oesterreichische militärische Zeitschrift”; Antoine-Henri Jomini, “Histoire critique et militaire des guerres de la Révolution”. ↩
  9. A. von Witzleben, “Prinz Friedrich Josias von Coburg-Saalfeld, Herzog zu Sachsen”; Arthur Chuquet, “La trahison de Dumouriez”; “Réimpression de l’ancien Moniteur”; Ramsay Weston Phipps, “The Armies of the First French Republic and the Rise of the Marshals of Napoleon I”. ↩
  10. Arthur Chuquet, “La trahison de Dumouriez”; Ramsay Weston Phipps, “The Armies of the First French Republic and the Rise of the Marshals of Napoleon I”; Antoine-Henri Jomini, “Histoire critique et militaire des guerres de la Révolution”. ↩
  11. Joseph Vinoy, “L’Armistice et la Commune”; Martial Delpit, “Le dix-huit mars”; Prosper-Olivier Lissagaray, “History of the Commune of 1871”. ↩

Sources

Battle honors of your homeland

The turning points of history

Marathon, Gaugamela, Cannae, Constantinople, Waterloo, Stalingrad: the days the world changed course.

Based on your country, which we do not store · why? ·

Relive the great battles

Echoes of Battle brings the great battles of history to life, scene by scene on the real map. Enlist below and we will send word to your inbox the day it launches.

Or supply the campaign on Ko-fi ›