PLEnlist

Nikephoros II Phokas: the White Death of the Saracens

Byzantine Empire · General and emperor · c. 912 to 969 · ~10 min read · Updated October 2026

A Byzantine warship turns a jet of Greek fire on an enemy boat, a miniature from the Madrid manuscript of John Skylitzes' chronicle.

Madrid Skylitzes, Biblioteca Nacional de España, 12th century, via Wikimedia Commons, public domain.

At a glance

Also known as
The White Death of the Saracens
Lived
c. 912 to 969
Role
Byzantine general, then emperor 963 to 969
Famous for
The reconquest of Crete, 961
Signature
Sieges and blockades in Cilicia and Syria
Legacy
Crete, Cyprus, Cilicia and Antioch back in Byzantine hands
Quick answer

Who was Nikephoros II Phokas?

Nikephoros II Phokas (c. 912 to 969) was a Byzantine general who ruled as emperor from 963 to 969. He won back Crete from the Arabs in 961, conquered Cilicia and Cyprus in 965 and pushed into Syria, where his generals took Antioch in 969. Weeks later he was murdered by conspirators led by his nephew John Tzimiskes.1

His wars were won more by sieges and blockades than by pitched battles: the winter-long siege of Chandax on Crete in 960 and 961, the capture of Aleppo in 962, the fall of Mopsuestia and Tarsus in 965 and the blockade of Antioch. Two Greek historians, Leo the Deacon and John Skylitzes, describe these campaigns, and this page draws on both.2

Where did Nikephoros Phokas come from?

Nikephoros was born around 912 into the Phokas family, one of the great military clans of Byzantine Asia Minor. His grandfather, Nikephoros the Elder, had fought the Arabs in southern Italy, and his father, Bardas Phokas, commanded the eastern armies in the early 950s. His brother Leo and his nephew John Tzimiskes also became leading generals.3

Little is known of his private life before the throne. His first wife died, and their only son, Bardas, was killed in an accident while riding at sport with a young relative, whose spear struck him. Nikephoros wore a hair shirt, gave up meat for years and spoke of becoming a monk, and he was a close friend of Athanasios, founder of the Great Lavra on Mount Athos.4

How did Nikephoros Phokas rise to command?

Nikephoros rose in the long war against Sayf al-Dawla, the Hamdanid emir of Aleppo. After the emir defeated Bardas Phokas in 953 and captured his son Constantine, Nikephoros, until then a provincial general, replaced his father as Domestic of the Schools, commander of the eastern armies, at the end of 954 or in 955.5

The tide then turned. In 958 John Tzimiskes took Samosata on the Euphrates, and George Dennis credits Nikephoros, his brother Leo and Tzimiskes with several major victories that laid waste parts of northern Syria. Leo the Deacon notes that, as a general and then as Domestic, Nikephoros sacked and burned many cities.6

Dark locator map of the eastern Mediterranean with Greece, the Aegean islands, Asia Minor, Cyprus and Egypt, and a gold star in a glowing circle on Crete, with a small world map inset
Location map: the star marks Chandax, the modern Heraklion, on Crete. Cyprus lies to the east, and beyond it the coast of Cilicia and northern Syria, where Nikephoros fought for the rest of his life. Location map: © Echoes of Battle (data: Natural Earth, public domain)

How did Nikephoros Phokas win back Crete?

In 960 Romanos II sent Nikephoros with a large fleet and army against Crete, held by the Arabs since the 820s. He landed, drove the defenders into Chandax, the island’s fortress capital, and besieged it through the winter. In March 961 his troops broke in with siege engines, a ram and sappers; Skylitzes dates the fall to 7 March.7

Byzantine manuscript miniature of ships and soldiers before a fortified city
The Byzantine fleet and army under Nikephoros Phokas before Chandax, capital of the Emirate of Crete, in a miniature from the 12th-century Madrid manuscript of John Skylitzes' chronicle (Biblioteca Nacional de España). Public domain

The emir, ‘Abd al-‘Aziz, called Kouroupas by the Byzantines, was taken prisoner with his son Anemas. Leo the Deacon describes a triumph in the Hippodrome in 961, with gold, armor and captives paraded before the people; Skylitzes says Nikephoros was kept out of the capital that year and held his triumph only in April 963. Ostrogorsky judged the recovery of Crete the greatest Byzantine victory in centuries.8

What were Nikephoros II Phokas’s greatest victories?

Besides Crete, his greatest successes came in the east. In December 962 he entered Aleppo, the Hamdanid capital, though not its citadel. As emperor he took Mopsuestia and Tarsus in 965, completing the conquest of Cilicia, while his fleet won back Cyprus the same year. His generals took Antioch in October 969, weeks before his death.9

Medieval miniature of mounted soldiers with spears attacking a colorful walled city
Byzantine troops under Nikephoros Phokas storm Berrhoia (Aleppo) in 962, a miniature from the illustrated Madrid manuscript of John Skylitzes' chronicle. Public domain

Tarsus beat off his first attack in 964. Leo the Deacon says Nikephoros drilled his men through the winter, returned in the spring of 965 and starved the city into surrender, letting its people leave. The sources disagree on Mopsuestia: Leo places its fall in 964, while Skylitzes and the Arab chronicler Yahya of Antioch place it in the summer of 965.10

Leo puts the army of 965 at 400,000 men. Schlumberger thought the figure probably exaggerated, and Leo’s translators add that Warren Treadgold suspects exaggeration or a copyist’s slip for 40,000; since Leo repeats the number, they think exaggeration more likely. They also note that Leo’s account of the fall of Tarsus differs from the other sources.11

In the west the news was bad. A fleet sent to Sicily in 964 or 965 was destroyed, and in his reign the last Byzantine strongholds on the island fell to the Muslims. In Syria he raided again in 966 and 968 and twice appeared before Antioch, seat of a patriarch and in Muslim hands since 636 or 637, after the Byzantine defeat at Yarmouk had opened Syria to the Arabs.12

On his way home in 968 he left forces to blockade Antioch. Skylitzes says he built a fortress on the Black Mountain for Michael Bourtzes and left his eunuch Peter in command of the troops in Cilicia. On 28 October 969, in his absence, Bourtzes and Peter took the city, which Ostrogorsky notes had been under Muslim rule for more than three centuries.13

How did Nikephoros Phokas become emperor?

Romanos II died on 15 March 963, leaving two small sons, Basil II and Constantine VIII, with the empress Theophano as regent. The minister Joseph Bringas tried to remove Nikephoros, but in July 963 the eastern army proclaimed him emperor at Caesarea. After street fighting in the capital he was crowned in Hagia Sophia on 16 August 963.14

He ruled as senior emperor beside the two boys, whose rights were left intact. On 20 September 963 he married Theophano. Patriarch Polyeuktos resisted the match, because it was a second marriage and because of a rumor that Nikephoros had been godfather to one of her children. He made his father Bardas caesar and his brother Leo kouropalates, and gave John Tzimiskes the eastern command.15

Medieval miniature of riders approaching a city gate where musicians play horns and drums
Nikephoros enters Constantinople as emperor in 963, greeted by musicians, in a miniature from the Madrid manuscript of Skylitzes' chronicle. Public domain

Why was Nikephoros II Phokas unpopular?

His wars were expensive. Nikephoros raised taxes and issued a lighter gold coin, the tetarteron; Skylitzes says he collected taxes in the heavy coin and paid out the light one. He and his brother Leo were accused of speculating in grain during a shortage, and a law of 964 banned new gifts of land to monasteries.16

Anger boiled over on Ascension Day, probably in 967. After a brawl between townspeople and his Armenian soldiers, a crowd jeered the emperor on his way back from the church of the Pege, and stones were thrown at him; Leo the Deacon names a woman and her daughter on a roof. He then walled off part of the Great Palace as a fortress.17

Leo, then a student in the city, says he watched Nikephoros ride on through the insults without losing his composure. Foreign envoys were less admiring. Liudprand of Cremona, sent by Otto I in 968 to seek a marriage alliance, was refused, kept almost as a prisoner, and told that his master was no Roman emperor but a barbarian king.18

In his report Liudprand described Nikephoros as “a monstrosity of a man, a pygmy, fat-headed and like a mole as to the smallness of his eyes”, in Ernest Henderson’s translation. Leo the Deacon, who had seen him, gives a calmer portrait: a swarthy, stooped man with thick dark hair, black eyes under bushy brows and a graying beard.19

He also left a dangerous legacy in the Balkans, a generation after the Bulgarian victory at Anchialus in 917. He refused the tribute Bulgaria had been paid and hired Sviatoslav, prince of Kiev, to attack it. The Rus invaded in 968 and in 969 took the Bulgarian capital, replacing a weak neighbor with a far more dangerous one.20

How did Nikephoros II Phokas die?

Nikephoros was murdered in his bedchamber on the night of 10 to 11 December 969. The conspirators were led by his nephew John Tzimiskes, whom he had removed from command, and were helped by the empress Theophano, who hid armed men in the palace. Tzimiskes seized the throne the same night and ruled as John I until 976.21

Leo the Deacon tells how, in falling snow, Tzimiskes and his companions came by boat to the shore below the palace and were hauled up one by one in a basket. They found the emperor asleep, wounded him, taunted him and killed him. His body lay in the snow through the next day before it was buried in secret in the Church of the Holy Apostles.22

Theophano’s part is told in different ways. Leo describes her as smuggling the killers in, and Ostrogorsky calls her the mistress and accomplice of Tzimiskes. According to Skylitzes, Tzimiskes, refused coronation by Patriarch Polyeuktos until he did penance, blamed two of the killers acting at the empress’s instigation, and Theophano was banished from the palace.23

Why was Nikephoros called the White Death of the Saracens?

The name comes from the court. When Liudprand of Cremona watched Nikephoros go to Hagia Sophia in procession at Pentecost 968, the singers acclaimed him as “the pale death of the Saracens”. Historians such as George Ostrogorsky use the phrase, translated as “the white death of the Saracens”, for his record against the Arabs.24

The court singers hailed him as the pale death of the Saracens.

Did Nikephoros Phokas write military manuals?

Two military treatises carry his name. The Praecepta militaria, from around 965, gives instructions for campaigns against the Arabs, and its editor Eric McGeer argues that the emperor wrote it himself. The treatise On Skirmishing, on frontier guerrilla warfare, was written at his order by an officer close to the Phokas family, probably soon after his death.25

McGeer and Leo’s translators point out how closely Leo’s account of the battle before Tarsus follows the Praecepta’s recommendations. George Dennis suggests that the author of On Skirmishing may have been Nikephoros’s brother Leo, whose victories it describes, though it does not name him.26

What is Nikephoros II Phokas’s legacy?

Nikephoros broke through the Taurus frontier that had held for centuries. Crete, Cyprus, Cilicia and Antioch returned to the empire, and Aleppo became a tributary state soon after his death. Ostrogorsky counts his reign and his two successors’ as the height of medieval Byzantine military power, which Basil II, who ruled from 976 to 1025, carried furthest.27

Gold coin of Nikephoros II Phokas showing the crowned emperor and the Virgin Mary holding a patriarchal cross between them.
Gold nomisma of Nikephoros II Phokas, struck 963 to 969: the emperor and the Virgin Mary hold a cross between them. Cleveland Museum of Art. CC0. Cleveland Museum of Art (1964.423), via Wikimedia Commons.

His epitaph, attributed to John, metropolitan of Melitene, and preserved in manuscripts of Skylitzes, calls on him to rise from the tomb against the Rus and ends with the man who “vanquished all but Eve”; Vasiliev renders the line as “vanquished all but woman”. Most of what is known about him comes from Leo the Deacon, whose History covers the years 959 to 976 and which Vasiliev calls the only contemporary Greek source for the reign.28

Skylitzes’s editor, following the historian Rosemary Morris, distinguishes two traditions about Nikephoros: a favorable one in Leo the Deacon and a hostile one that Skylitzes used, which lists the reasons he was hated.29 › The Greatest Battles of the Byzantine Empire

Meet the other great commanders of the Byzantine Empire, or measure them against the world’s best in the greatest military commanders.

Notes

A number in the text points to a note; each note names the works that paragraph draws on, listed in full under Sources.

  1. Leo the Deacon, “The History of Leo the Deacon”; George Ostrogorsky, “History of the Byzantine State”. ↩
  2. Leo the Deacon, “The History of Leo the Deacon”; John Skylitzes, “A Synopsis of Byzantine History, 811-1057”; George Ostrogorsky, “History of the Byzantine State”. ↩
  3. Leo the Deacon, “The History of Leo the Deacon”; John Skylitzes, “A Synopsis of Byzantine History, 811-1057”; George Ostrogorsky, “History of the Byzantine State”; George T. Dennis, “Three Byzantine Military Treatises”. ↩
  4. Leo the Deacon, “The History of Leo the Deacon”; John Skylitzes, “A Synopsis of Byzantine History, 811-1057”; Gustave Schlumberger, “Un empereur byzantin au dixième siècle”; A. A. Vasiliev, “History of the Byzantine Empire, 324-1453”; George Ostrogorsky, “History of the Byzantine State”. ↩
  5. George T. Dennis, “Three Byzantine Military Treatises”; George Ostrogorsky, “History of the Byzantine State”; Leo the Deacon, “The History of Leo the Deacon”. ↩
  6. George Ostrogorsky, “History of the Byzantine State”; John Skylitzes, “A Synopsis of Byzantine History, 811-1057”; George T. Dennis, “Three Byzantine Military Treatises”; Leo the Deacon, “The History of Leo the Deacon”. ↩
  7. Leo the Deacon, “The History of Leo the Deacon”; George Ostrogorsky, “History of the Byzantine State”; John Skylitzes, “A Synopsis of Byzantine History, 811-1057”. ↩
  8. John Skylitzes, “A Synopsis of Byzantine History, 811-1057”; Gustave Schlumberger, “Un empereur byzantin au dixième siècle”; Leo the Deacon, “The History of Leo the Deacon”; George Ostrogorsky, “History of the Byzantine State”. ↩
  9. George Ostrogorsky, “History of the Byzantine State”; John Skylitzes, “A Synopsis of Byzantine History, 811-1057”; Gustave Schlumberger, “Un empereur byzantin au dixième siècle”; Leo the Deacon, “The History of Leo the Deacon”. ↩
  10. Leo the Deacon, “The History of Leo the Deacon”; John Skylitzes, “A Synopsis of Byzantine History, 811-1057”; George Ostrogorsky, “History of the Byzantine State”. ↩
  11. Leo the Deacon, “The History of Leo the Deacon”; Gustave Schlumberger, “Un empereur byzantin au dixième siècle”. ↩
  12. Leo the Deacon, “The History of Leo the Deacon”; John Skylitzes, “A Synopsis of Byzantine History, 811-1057”; A. A. Vasiliev, “History of the Byzantine Empire, 324-1453”; Gustave Schlumberger, “Un empereur byzantin au dixième siècle”; George Ostrogorsky, “History of the Byzantine State”. ↩
  13. John Skylitzes, “A Synopsis of Byzantine History, 811-1057”; Leo the Deacon, “The History of Leo the Deacon”; George Ostrogorsky, “History of the Byzantine State”. ↩
  14. George Ostrogorsky, “History of the Byzantine State”; John Skylitzes, “A Synopsis of Byzantine History, 811-1057”; Leo the Deacon, “The History of Leo the Deacon”; Gustave Schlumberger, “Un empereur byzantin au dixième siècle”. ↩
  15. George Ostrogorsky, “History of the Byzantine State”; John Skylitzes, “A Synopsis of Byzantine History, 811-1057”; Gustave Schlumberger, “Un empereur byzantin au dixième siècle”; Leo the Deacon, “The History of Leo the Deacon”. ↩
  16. Leo the Deacon, “The History of Leo the Deacon”; John Skylitzes, “A Synopsis of Byzantine History, 811-1057”; Gustave Schlumberger, “Un empereur byzantin au dixième siècle”; George Ostrogorsky, “History of the Byzantine State”; A. A. Vasiliev, “History of the Byzantine Empire, 324-1453”. ↩
  17. Leo the Deacon, “The History of Leo the Deacon”; John Skylitzes, “A Synopsis of Byzantine History, 811-1057”; Gustave Schlumberger, “Un empereur byzantin au dixième siècle”. ↩
  18. Leo the Deacon, “The History of Leo the Deacon”; George Ostrogorsky, “History of the Byzantine State”; Liudprand of Cremona, “Report of his Mission to Constantinople”; Liudprand of Cremona, “The Embassy to Constantinople”. ↩
  19. Liudprand of Cremona, “Report of his Mission to Constantinople”; Liudprand of Cremona, “The Embassy to Constantinople”; Leo the Deacon, “The History of Leo the Deacon”; John Skylitzes, “A Synopsis of Byzantine History, 811-1057”. ↩
  20. A. A. Vasiliev, “History of the Byzantine Empire, 324-1453”; George Ostrogorsky, “History of the Byzantine State”; Leo the Deacon, “The History of Leo the Deacon”; John Skylitzes, “A Synopsis of Byzantine History, 811-1057”. ↩
  21. Leo the Deacon, “The History of Leo the Deacon”; George Ostrogorsky, “History of the Byzantine State”; John Skylitzes, “A Synopsis of Byzantine History, 811-1057”; Gustave Schlumberger, “Un empereur byzantin au dixième siècle”. ↩
  22. Leo the Deacon, “The History of Leo the Deacon”; Gustave Schlumberger, “Un empereur byzantin au dixième siècle”. ↩
  23. Leo the Deacon, “The History of Leo the Deacon”; George Ostrogorsky, “History of the Byzantine State”; John Skylitzes, “A Synopsis of Byzantine History, 811-1057”. ↩
  24. Liudprand of Cremona, “Report of his Mission to Constantinople”; Liudprand of Cremona, “The Embassy to Constantinople”; George Ostrogorsky, “History of the Byzantine State”. ↩
  25. Eric McGeer, “Sowing the Dragon’s Teeth”; Leo the Deacon, “The History of Leo the Deacon”; George T. Dennis, “Three Byzantine Military Treatises”; Gustave Schlumberger, “Un empereur byzantin au dixième siècle”. ↩
  26. Eric McGeer, “Sowing the Dragon’s Teeth”; Leo the Deacon, “The History of Leo the Deacon”; George T. Dennis, “Three Byzantine Military Treatises”. ↩
  27. George Ostrogorsky, “History of the Byzantine State”; A. A. Vasiliev, “History of the Byzantine Empire, 324-1453”; Leo the Deacon, “The History of Leo the Deacon”. ↩
  28. John Skylitzes, “A Synopsis of Byzantine History, 811-1057”; Eric McGeer, “Sowing the Dragon’s Teeth”; A. A. Vasiliev, “History of the Byzantine Empire, 324-1453”; Leo the Deacon, “The History of Leo the Deacon”. ↩
  29. John Skylitzes, “A Synopsis of Byzantine History, 811-1057”; Leo the Deacon, “The History of Leo the Deacon”. ↩

Sources

  • Leo the Deacon, “The History of Leo the Deacon: Byzantine Military Expansion in the Tenth Century”, introduction, translation and annotations by Alice-Mary Talbot and Denis F. Sullivan (Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, 2005).
  • George Ostrogorsky, “History of the Byzantine State”, trans. Joan Hussey, 2nd English edition (Basil Blackwell, 1968).
  • John Skylitzes, “A Synopsis of Byzantine History, 811-1057”, trans. John Wortley, notes by Jean-Claude Cheynet (Cambridge University Press, 2010).
  • George T. Dennis, “Three Byzantine Military Treatises” (Dumbarton Oaks, 1985), introduction to “Skirmishing”.
  • Gustave Schlumberger, “Un empereur byzantin au dixième siècle: Nicéphore Phocas” (Firmin-Didot, 1890), read at the Internet Archive.
  • A. A. Vasiliev, “History of the Byzantine Empire, 324-1453” (University of Wisconsin Press, 1952), read at the Internet Archive.
  • Liudprand of Cremona, “Report of his Mission to Constantinople”, trans. Ernest F. Henderson, Select Historical Documents of the Middle Ages (1910), Internet Medieval Sourcebook, Fordham University.
  • Liudprand of Cremona, “The Embassy to Constantinople”, in The Works of Liudprand of Cremona, trans. F. A. Wright (E. P. Dutton, 1930), read at the Internet Archive.
  • Eric McGeer, “Sowing the Dragon’s Teeth: Byzantine Warfare in the Tenth Century” (Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, 1995).

Written from established histories; where the sources disagree we say so. See our editorial policy.

Frequently asked questions

What was Nikephoros II Phokas famous for?

Nikephoros II Phokas is famous for winning back Crete from the Arabs in 961 after a winter-long siege of Chandax. As emperor from 963 to 969 he conquered Cilicia and Cyprus in 965 and pushed into Syria, where his generals took Antioch in 969. He was murdered in his palace that December.

Why was Nikephoros Phokas called the White Death of the Saracens?

The phrase comes from the court acclamations of his reign. Liudprand of Cremona heard the singers of Constantinople hail him in 968 as “the pale death of the Saracens”, the Arabs he fought on the eastern frontier. Historians such as George Ostrogorsky render the epithet as “the white death of the Saracens”.

How did Nikephoros II Phokas become emperor?

After Romanos II died in March 963, the eastern army proclaimed Nikephoros emperor at Caesarea in July. Following street fighting in Constantinople against the minister Joseph Bringas, he was crowned in Hagia Sophia on 16 August 963 as senior emperor beside the boys Basil II and Constantine VIII.

Who killed Nikephoros II Phokas?

Nikephoros was killed on the night of 10 to 11 December 969 by conspirators led by his nephew John Tzimiskes, whom he had removed from command. The empress Theophano helped them by hiding armed men in the palace. Tzimiskes took the throne as John I, and Theophano was later banished.

Did Nikephoros Phokas capture Antioch?

Not in person. Nikephoros besieged Antioch in 966 and 968 and left forces to blockade it under Michael Bourtzes and the eunuch Peter. They took the city on 28 October 969, while the emperor was in Constantinople. Antioch had been under Muslim rule for more than three centuries.

Who was the wife of Nikephoros II Phokas?

His second wife was the empress Theophano, widow of Romanos II and mother of Basil II and Constantine VIII. They married on 20 September 963, a match the patriarch Polyeuktos resisted. Six years later she helped John Tzimiskes and his men into the palace on the night Nikephoros was murdered.

Who succeeded Nikephoros II Phokas?

His murderer and nephew, John I Tzimiskes, ruled from 969 to 976 as senior emperor beside the young Basil II and Constantine VIII. After Tzimiskes died in 976, Basil II ruled until 1025 and carried the Byzantine recovery that Nikephoros had driven forward to its greatest extent.

Battle honors of your homeland

The turning points of history

Marathon, Gaugamela, Cannae, Constantinople, Waterloo, Stalingrad: the days the world changed course.

Based on your country, which we do not store · why? ·

Win back Crete from the sea

Echoes of Battle brings the great battles of history to life, scene by scene on the real map. Enlist below and we will send word to your inbox the day it launches.