PLEnlist

1 December in military history: Battle of the Argeș, 1916

Military history · 1 December · World War I, Romanian campaignFull calendar

Field Marshal August von Mackensen in a spiked helmet and greatcoat on a white horse under bare trees in Bucharest, mounted officers in fur caps and helmets behind him, in black and white
Field Marshal August von Mackensen at a parade in Bucharest during the German occupation, a German official photograph (Bufa 7704) held by the U.S. National Archives. Public domain. U.S. National Archives and Records Administration, NAID 17391546.
Quick answer

On 1 December 1916, in World War I, the Romanian army under General Constantin Prezan struck the flank of August von Mackensen's Danube Army on the Neajlov River, southwest of Bucharest. The attack gained ground at first, but the Germans captured the Romanian orders, and by 3 December it had collapsed. Bucharest fell on 6 December.1

Two armies closing on the capital

Romania entered the war on the Allied side in August 1916 and opened with an offensive into Transylvania. The Central Powers struck back. Erich von Falkenhayn's Ninth Army drove the Romanians out of Transylvania and in November broke through the Carpathians into Wallachia, while Mackensen's forces, which had overrun Dobruja, crossed the Danube. The historian Sorin Cristescu, speaking to Radio Romania International, places the crossing at Zimnicea, at about the time Falkenhayn's troops crossed the Olt, around 23 November. By the end of November the two enemy armies were converging on Bucharest.2

Romania still kept the Julian calendar, so Romanian accounts give the battle that followed old and new style dates, from 16/29 November to 20 November/3 December 1916. Romanian writers call it the Battle of Bucharest or the Battle of the Neajlov and Argeș.3

Prezan's gamble

General Constantin Prezan commanded the operation. His idea, as Cristescu describes it, was to strike the two German armies one at a time before they could join, while waiting for Russian reinforcements that came late. The historian George Marcu, quoted by Adevărul, writes that Romanian appeals for Russian troops brought no real result. Falkenhayn later summed up the Romanian plan in a note quoted by the Romanian magazine Historia: the 1st Army, about four divisions, would hold the line of the Argeș, while a maneuver group of four infantry divisions and a cavalry division fell on the left flank of Mackensen's Danube Army and two Russian divisions pinned its right wing. The plan, he wrote, would not have been a bad one had it not ignored the German group under Kühne coming up from the west.4

The blow fell across the Neajlov. According to Marcu, on 1 December the Romanians won successes in every sector and threw the enemy back with heavy losses. Historia agrees that the first attacks succeeded before the Romanian units were overwhelmed by German numbers and guns.5

The captured orders

Then the plan was lost. A Romanian army car carrying operation orders fell into German hands. In Falkenhayn's note, the order was beyond doubt genuine, taken from two Romanian staff officers who had strayed with their car into the German lines, and it “completely dispelled the darkness” about Romanian intentions. The Germans now knew where the Romanian units stood and what they meant to do. Cristescu, for his part, argues that German superiority would have decided the battle even without the lost car.6

On 3 December the Germans struck the Romanian forces between the Neajlov and the Argeș from several sides at once, Falkenhayn's divisions falling without warning on their rear. By the morning of 4 December, Marcu writes, the whole line of the Argeș was in enemy hands; Cristescu agrees that by then Bucharest could not be defended.7

The fall of Bucharest

The Romanian command decided to give up the capital without a fight. German, Austro-Hungarian and allied troops occupied Bucharest on 6 December 1916. The court and the government had already moved north to Iași, in Moldavia.8

The rest of the Romanian army fell back into Moldavia, where, with Russian troops at last beside it, it built a new line and stopped the Central Powers. The occupation of Bucharest lasted until November 1918.9

Frequently asked questions

What was the Battle of the Argeș?

It was the last Romanian attempt to save Bucharest in 1916. Romanian troops under General Constantin Prezan attacked the flank of Mackensen's Danube Army on the Neajlov and Argeș rivers, but the attack failed and Bucharest fell on 6 December.

Why do Romanian sources give two dates?

Romania still used the Julian calendar in 1916, 13 days behind the Gregorian one. Romanian accounts therefore write the battle as 16/29 November to 20 November/3 December 1916.

What went wrong for the Romanians?

A Romanian army car carrying the operation orders fell into German hands, so the Germans learned the Romanian dispositions and intentions. The Central Powers also had more men and guns, and the Russian help Romania asked for came too late.

When did Bucharest fall?

On 6 December 1916. The Romanian command decided to leave the city without a fight, and the court and government moved to Iași in Moldavia.

Notes

A number in the text points to a note; each note names the works that paragraph draws on, listed in full under Sources.

  1. Alexandru Armă, “Bătălia Bucureștilor, o ultimă încercare de a salva Capitala, la sfârșitul anului 1916”; Denis Grigorescu, “Povestea bătăliei de la Neajlov-Argeş”; Steliu Lambru, “The Battle for Bucharest”; Bucharest Municipal Museum, “Bucharest under Occupation (1916-1918)”. ↩
  2. Steliu Lambru, “The Battle for Bucharest”; Gerhard Hetzer, “On the Romanian Campaign of the Central Powers 1916/17”; Denis Grigorescu, “Povestea bătăliei de la Neajlov-Argeş”; Alexandru Armă, “Bătălia Bucureștilor, o ultimă încercare de a salva Capitala, la sfârșitul anului 1916”. ↩
  3. Alexandru Armă, “Bătălia Bucureștilor, o ultimă încercare de a salva Capitala, la sfârșitul anului 1916”; Denis Grigorescu, “Povestea bătăliei de la Neajlov-Argeş”. ↩
  4. Alexandru Armă, “Bătălia Bucureștilor, o ultimă încercare de a salva Capitala, la sfârșitul anului 1916”; Denis Grigorescu, “Povestea bătăliei de la Neajlov-Argeş”; Steliu Lambru, “The Battle for Bucharest”. ↩
  5. Denis Grigorescu, “Povestea bătăliei de la Neajlov-Argeş”; Alexandru Armă, “Bătălia Bucureștilor, o ultimă încercare de a salva Capitala, la sfârșitul anului 1916”. ↩
  6. Alexandru Armă, “Bătălia Bucureștilor, o ultimă încercare de a salva Capitala, la sfârșitul anului 1916”; Denis Grigorescu, “Povestea bătăliei de la Neajlov-Argeş”; Steliu Lambru, “The Battle for Bucharest”. ↩
  7. Alexandru Armă, “Bătălia Bucureștilor, o ultimă încercare de a salva Capitala, la sfârșitul anului 1916”; Denis Grigorescu, “Povestea bătăliei de la Neajlov-Argeş”; Steliu Lambru, “The Battle for Bucharest”. ↩
  8. Alexandru Armă, “Bătălia Bucureștilor, o ultimă încercare de a salva Capitala, la sfârșitul anului 1916”; Steliu Lambru, “The Battle for Bucharest”; Bucharest Municipal Museum, “Bucharest under Occupation (1916-1918)”; Gerhard Hetzer, “On the Romanian Campaign of the Central Powers 1916/17”. ↩
  9. Steliu Lambru, “The Battle for Bucharest”; Gerhard Hetzer, “On the Romanian Campaign of the Central Powers 1916/17”; Bucharest Municipal Museum, “Bucharest under Occupation (1916-1918)”. ↩

Sources

Battle honors of your homeland

The turning points of history

Marathon, Gaugamela, Cannae, Constantinople, Waterloo, Stalingrad: the days the world changed course.

Based on your country, which we do not store · why? ·

Relive the great battles

Echoes of Battle brings the great battles of history to life, scene by scene on the real map. Enlist below and we will send word to your inbox the day it launches.

Or supply the campaign on Ko-fi ›