PLEnlist

The Battle of Agincourt, 1415: the longbow's day

Medieval · 25 October 1415 · England vs France · ~6 min read · Updated October 2026

Next anniversary: 25 October 2026, the 611th anniversary 25 October in history ›

English longbowmen loosing arrows on the French at Agincourt, 1415

St Albans Chronicle by Thomas Walsingham, Lambeth Palace Library, c. 1422, via Wikimedia Commons, public domain.

At a glance

vs
Kingdom of FranceConstable Charles d'Albret; Marshal Boucicaut
Date
25 October 1415
Location
Azincourt (Agincourt), Pas-de-Calais, France
War
Hundred Years' War
Outcome
Decisive English victory
By the numbers
SideStrengthKilled
Kingdom of England~6,000 to 8,500a few hundred at most (about 400 by Britannica's estimate)
Kingdom of France~12,000 to 30,000~6,000 to 7,000, with many more taken prisoner

Rounded estimates. Britannica gives the common figures of about 6,000 English and 20,000 to 30,000 French; Anne Curry (University of Southampton), working from the pay records, about 8,500 English and 12,000 French.

Quick answer

Who won the Battle of Agincourt?

England under Henry V won the Battle of Agincourt on 25 October 1415, when a tired, sick and outnumbered English army defeated a much larger French army on a muddy field in northern France. Thousands of Frenchmen, many of them nobles, were killed or captured, against a few hundred English dead. The victory opened the way to the English conquest of Normandy and the Treaty of Troyes of 1420.1

On the evening of 24 October 1415 two armies camped close to each other in Artois, in northern France, while rain fell on the freshly plowed fields between them. One was a small English army that had been marching for more than two weeks, short of food and riddled with dysentery. The other was the army of the kingdom of France, larger by far, led by the great nobles of the realm. By the next afternoon the French army had been destroyed, and the name of a small village, Azincourt, which the English called Agincourt, had entered the history of war.2

The battle from both sides

Two perspectives

Henry V had taken Harfleur, but the siege cost him dearly in dead, sick and deserters, and he was marching his weakened army to English-held Calais when the French cut him off. He chose to stand on a narrow field between woods, with his archers in front behind sharpened stakes. The French came on through deep mud under the arrows, and the English, archers and men-at-arms together, cut them down or took them prisoner. The victory strengthened Henry at home and in France.3

The French came to Agincourt with a larger army and the leading nobles of France, sure that they could stop the English before Calais. But the field between the woods narrowed their front, and the mud and the arrows broke the first attacks. Packed together and exhausted, the men-at-arms could neither fight properly nor withdraw. Many great lords were killed or captured, and the defeat left the French nobility weakened and divided before the next English invasion.4

Background: Henry V's war

Agincourt was a battle of the Hundred Years' War, the long, intermittent struggle between the kings of England and France over the French crown and English lands in France, which Henry's great-grandfather Edward III had pressed with such success. After the English victories of the 14th century the fighting had died down into truces and negotiations. Henry V, who became king in March 1413, revived the claims: he demanded not only Aquitaine but also Normandy and other former English lands, terms the French would not accept.5 › The Battle of Crécy, 1346

Dark locator map with a gold star marking the site of the Battle of Agincourt in northern France, with the coasts and rivers of the region and a small world map inset
Where the battle was fought: the star marks Azincourt in Artois, northern France, between the English landing place at Harfleur and Calais. Drawn for this article from Natural Earth data, with no modern borders. Location map: © Echoes of Battle (data: Natural Earth, public domain)

France was in no state to resist. King Charles VI suffered from bouts of mental illness, and the great princes of his blood, led by the Dukes of Burgundy and Orléans, fought each other for control of the government. Henry's preparations, by contrast, were thorough: he paid for the invasion with loans and parliamentary taxes, pawning even royal plate as security for wages, and gathered a fleet in the ports of southern England.6

In mid-August 1415 the English army landed in Normandy near Harfleur, at the mouth of the Seine, and laid siege to the town. The siege took longer than planned. Fever and dysentery spread through the camp in the marshes around the walls, and by the time Harfleur surrendered on 22 September, after more than five weeks, the army had lost many men to disease, death and desertion.7

Henry decided not to sail home but to march overland to Calais, the English town on the coast of Picardy. He left Harfleur on about 8 October. French troops held the crossings of the lower Somme, so the English had to march far upstream before they could get across. The detour gave the French time to gather an army in front of them, and on 24 October the English found it barring the road near Agincourt.8

Armies and commanders

Henry commanded the English army in person. He was 28 or 29, depending on which year of birth is accepted, and had been king for two and a half years. With him were his brother Humphrey, Duke of Gloucester, and his cousin Edward, Duke of York. The archers were the backbone of the army: the dismounted men-at-arms stood in the center, and the archers were grouped in wedges on the flanks and along the front.9

Profile portrait of King Henry V with short dark hair against a patterned background
Henry V in profile, a portrait painted long after his death, in the late 16th or early 17th century, National Portrait Gallery, London. Unknown artist, King Henry V, late 16th or early 17th century. Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

The French army was commanded by the Constable of France, Charles d'Albret, and the Marshal, Jean le Meingre, known as Boucicaut. With them were the Dukes of Orléans, Bourbon and Alençon and many of the great lords of northern France, and Anthony, Duke of Brabant, a younger brother of the Duke of Burgundy, rode hard to join them.10

How large the two armies were is still argued. Britannica gives the common estimate of about 6,000 English against 20,000 to 30,000 French, a ratio of up to five to one. Anne Curry of the University of Southampton, working from muster rolls and pay records, puts the English at about 8,500 and the French at around 12,000, a far narrower gap; she argues that the larger French figures would not even have fitted onto the field. Writing in 1885, Charles Oman still gave the French sixty thousand men, a number no one now accepts.11

Painting of armored English soldiers and knights massed on a muddy field under a stormy sky, with banners raised
The English army waits on the morning of 25 October, as the Victorian painter Sir John Gilbert imagined it in 1884. Sir John Gilbert, The Morning of the Battle of Agincourt, 25th October 1415, 1884. Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

The battle in phases

The field. The two armies faced each other across open, newly plowed fields between the woods around the villages of Agincourt and Tramecourt. The ground narrowed toward the English end, so the French could not spread out and use their numbers to outflank the English line. After a week of rain the soil was soft and heavy.12

The stakes. In front of them the archers drove sharpened stakes into the ground, angled toward the enemy, as a barrier against charging horsemen. Behind that hedge of points the bowmen waited for the French to come within range.13

The waiting. For hours that morning neither side moved. The French, who were blocking the road to Calais, could afford to wait for reinforcements or for hunger to do their work; the English could not. Between ten and eleven o'clock Henry ordered his line forward until the French were within bowshot, and the archers opened fire. The battle had begun.14

Medieval miniature of two armies of archers loosing arrows at each other across a field, with armored knights behind them
English and French archers shoot across the field at Agincourt in a French manuscript miniature of about 1470 to 1480, painted some two generations after the battle. Unknown illuminator, Battle of Agincourt, about 1470 to 1480. Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

The cavalry charge. Mounted men on the French flanks charged first, against the archers. They failed. The stakes stopped them, the arrows brought down men and horses, and only a fraction of the riders reached the English line before they were driven back.15

The advance through the mud. Behind them the main French line came on foot, most of the men-at-arms having sent their horses to the rear. Weighed down by their armor, they plodded across the soaked plowland under the arrows. As the field narrowed they were pressed tighter and tighter together, until many could barely lift their weapons.16

Turning point: the melee

When the exhausted first line reached the English, the archers put down their bows and joined the men-at-arms with swords, axes and whatever came to hand. Lightly equipped and fresh, they moved freely among the French knights, who were stuck in the mud and jammed together. Men fell and could not rise as others fell on top of them, and the dead lay heaped in front of the English line. The second French line, pushing forward behind the first, only added to the crush.17

Henry fought in the thick of it. The chroniclers record that a French knight got close enough to strike his helmet and break off part of the crown he wore on it. On the English side the Duke of York was killed, and with him the young Earl of Suffolk and the Welsh squire Dafydd Gam, known as Davy Gam.18

Then came the darkest moment of the day. With the battle apparently won and the English busy gathering prisoners, word came that the French were attacking the baggage in the rear; local lords with a band of peasants had in fact plundered it. At the same time part of the French army seemed to be rallying for a fresh attack. Fearing that his prisoners would take up arms again, Henry ordered them killed, and many were. Nicolas, writing in 1833, stressed that the order is admitted without exception by the contemporary writers, many of them French. The Southampton historian Rémy Ambühl, studying about 100 ransom contracts, found that men of every rank were still held for ransom afterwards, which suggests that the killing, if it took place, did not spare the great lords at the expense of the humble.19

Aftermath

The battle had lasted perhaps three hours. How many English died is uncertain: the English chroniclers gave anything from 17 to about 100, the French from 300 to 1,600, and Britannica estimates about 400. The French dead were counted in thousands, about 6,000 by Britannica's estimate and 7,000 according to the Pas-de-Calais tourist board, many of them nobles. The Dukes of Alençon and Brabant were among the dead; the Dukes of Orléans and Bourbon were found alive among the bodies and taken to England as prisoners.20

The English marched on to Calais and sailed home in November; Henry landed at Dover on 16 November. In London the news had already set the bells ringing and the mayor walking to Westminster to give thanks at the shrine of Edward the Confessor, where a Te Deum was sung for the victory. On 23 November the city gave the king a triumphal entry with pageants and choirs, and the song now known as the Agincourt Carol, with its refrain “Deo gratias Anglia,” may have been written for it.21

Agincourt did not end the war, but it changed its course. The French nobility, weakened and divided, could not meet the next English invasion. Henry returned and conquered Normandy town by town, taking its capital, Rouen, after a long siege. By the Treaty of Troyes of 21 May 1420 he was recognized as regent and heir of France, and on 2 June he married Catherine, daughter of Charles VI, at Troyes. He did not live to wear the French crown: he died at Vincennes on 31 August 1422.22 › The Battle of Verneuil, 1424

Medieval miniature of a royal wedding: a crowned king and a crowned princess join hands before a bishop, with courtiers on both sides
The marriage of Henry V and Catherine of Valois at Troyes on 2 June 1420, the political harvest of Agincourt, in a copy of Jean Chartier's chronicle illuminated before 1494 (British Library, Royal 20 E VI). Unknown illuminator, Jean Chartier, Chronique de Charles VII, before 1494. Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Legacy and memory

In England the victory set off an outpouring of national feeling, and Anne Curry argues that Agincourt became bound up with the idea of Britishness itself: the struggle of little England against the world, won by the common archer. For military historians it became, with Crécy and Poitiers, one of the classic victories of the English longbow over the knight. Charles Oman, writing in 1885, judged that the French could not have broken the English line by a frontal attack even on dry ground, and that the Constable should never have attacked at all.23 › Longbow vs crossbow

Shakespeare restaged the battle in Henry V in 1599, with its Saint Crispin's Day speech and its “band of brothers,” and Curry argues that his version is the one most people still carry in their heads. She has also traced the myths that grew around the battle: the story that English archers invented the two-fingered V sign to show the French they still had their fingers has no medieval source at all, and the Welsh, often said to have made up much of the army, were in fact about 500 archers and a handful of men-at-arms.24

In France the day is remembered as a disaster that struck down the flower of the nobility. In England, from the late 16th century, families began to claim ancestors at the battle and to set the word Agincourt in their coats of arms. Curry has built a database of the men of the campaign from muster rolls and pay records against which such claims can now be checked.25 › Battles won against the odds

Visiting the battlefield today

The battlefield lies in the countryside of the Seven Valleys (7 Vallées) in the Pas-de-Calais. In the village of Azincourt the Centre Azincourt 1415, a museum and interpretation center, follows the campaign from the English landing to the battle and shows how people in the region lived in the 15th century. From there visitors can go out onto the battlefield itself, and an observation tower gives a view over the fields where the armies met.26 › 25 October in military history

Notes

A number in the text points to a note; each note names the works that paragraph draws on, listed in full under Sources.

  1. Julia Martinez, Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Battle of Agincourt”; C. D. Ross, Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Henry V”; J. H. Wylie, The Reign of Henry the Fifth, vol. II (1919). ↩
  2. Julia Martinez, Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Battle of Agincourt”; Charles Oman, The Art of War in the Middle Ages (1885); J. H. Wylie, The Reign of Henry the Fifth, vol. II (1919). ↩
  3. Julia Martinez, Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Battle of Agincourt”; Charles Oman, The Art of War in the Middle Ages (1885); University of Southampton, “The truth about Agincourt”. ↩
  4. Julia Martinez, Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Battle of Agincourt”; Charles Oman, The Art of War in the Middle Ages (1885); Harris Nicolas, History of the Battle of Agincourt (1833). ↩
  5. Julia Martinez, Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Battle of Agincourt”; C. D. Ross, Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Henry V”; Harris Nicolas, History of the Battle of Agincourt (1833). ↩
  6. Julia Martinez, Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Battle of Agincourt”; C. D. Ross, Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Henry V”; Harris Nicolas, History of the Battle of Agincourt (1833); J. H. Wylie, The Reign of Henry the Fifth, vol. II (1919). ↩
  7. Julia Martinez, Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Battle of Agincourt”; J. H. Wylie, The Reign of Henry the Fifth, vol. II (1919); Harris Nicolas, History of the Battle of Agincourt (1833). ↩
  8. Julia Martinez, Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Battle of Agincourt”; Harris Nicolas, History of the Battle of Agincourt (1833); J. H. Wylie, The Reign of Henry the Fifth, vol. II (1919); Charles Oman, The Art of War in the Middle Ages (1885). ↩
  9. C. D. Ross, Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Henry V”; Westminster Abbey, “Henry V and Catherine de Valois”; Julia Martinez, Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Battle of Agincourt”; J. H. Wylie, The Reign of Henry the Fifth, vol. II (1919); Harris Nicolas, History of the Battle of Agincourt (1833). ↩
  10. Julia Martinez, Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Battle of Agincourt”; Harris Nicolas, History of the Battle of Agincourt (1833); J. H. Wylie, The Reign of Henry the Fifth, vol. II (1919). ↩
  11. Julia Martinez, Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Battle of Agincourt”; University of Southampton, “The truth about Agincourt”; Charles Oman, The Art of War in the Middle Ages (1885). ↩
  12. Julia Martinez, Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Battle of Agincourt”; Charles Oman, The Art of War in the Middle Ages (1885); J. H. Wylie, The Reign of Henry the Fifth, vol. II (1919); Harris Nicolas, History of the Battle of Agincourt (1833). ↩
  13. Julia Martinez, Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Battle of Agincourt”; Charles Oman, The Art of War in the Middle Ages (1885); J. H. Wylie, The Reign of Henry the Fifth, vol. II (1919). ↩
  14. Julia Martinez, Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Battle of Agincourt”; Harris Nicolas, History of the Battle of Agincourt (1833); Charles Oman, The Art of War in the Middle Ages (1885). ↩
  15. Julia Martinez, Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Battle of Agincourt”; Harris Nicolas, History of the Battle of Agincourt (1833); Charles Oman, The Art of War in the Middle Ages (1885). ↩
  16. Julia Martinez, Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Battle of Agincourt”; Charles Oman, The Art of War in the Middle Ages (1885); Harris Nicolas, History of the Battle of Agincourt (1833). ↩
  17. Julia Martinez, Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Battle of Agincourt”; Charles Oman, The Art of War in the Middle Ages (1885); J. H. Wylie, The Reign of Henry the Fifth, vol. II (1919). ↩
  18. J. H. Wylie, The Reign of Henry the Fifth, vol. II (1919); Harris Nicolas, History of the Battle of Agincourt (1833); Medievalists.net, “Five Myths about the Battle of Agincourt”. ↩
  19. Julia Martinez, Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Battle of Agincourt”; Harris Nicolas, History of the Battle of Agincourt (1833); J. H. Wylie, The Reign of Henry the Fifth, vol. II (1919); University of Southampton, “The truth about Agincourt”. ↩
  20. Julia Martinez, Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Battle of Agincourt”; Harris Nicolas, History of the Battle of Agincourt (1833); Visit Pas-de-Calais, “Relive 1415 and the Battle of Agincourt”; J. H. Wylie, The Reign of Henry the Fifth, vol. II (1919). ↩
  21. Julia Martinez, Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Battle of Agincourt”; Harris Nicolas, History of the Battle of Agincourt (1833); J. H. Wylie, The Reign of Henry the Fifth, vol. II (1919); Westminster Abbey, “Henry V and Catherine de Valois”. ↩
  22. Julia Martinez, Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Battle of Agincourt”; C. D. Ross, Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Henry V”; J. H. Wylie and W. T. Waugh, The Reign of Henry the Fifth, vol. III (1929); Westminster Abbey, “Henry V and Catherine de Valois”. ↩
  23. Julia Martinez, Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Battle of Agincourt”; University of Southampton, “The truth about Agincourt”; Charles Oman, The Art of War in the Middle Ages (1885). ↩
  24. University of Southampton, “The truth about Agincourt”; Medievalists.net, “Five Myths about the Battle of Agincourt”; Julia Martinez, Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Battle of Agincourt”. ↩
  25. Visit Pas-de-Calais, “Relive 1415 and the Battle of Agincourt”; Julia Martinez, Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Battle of Agincourt”; University of Southampton, “The truth about Agincourt”; Medievalists.net, “Five Myths about the Battle of Agincourt”. ↩
  26. Visit Pas-de-Calais, “Relive 1415 and the Battle of Agincourt”; Office de Tourisme des 7 Vallées, “Les incontournables en 7 Vallées”. ↩

Sources

Frequently asked questions

Who won the Battle of Agincourt?

The English under King Henry V, who defeated a much larger French army on 25 October 1415. Thousands of French were killed or captured, against a few hundred English dead.

Why did the French lose at Agincourt?

The narrow field between two woods stopped them from using their numbers, the rain-soaked plowland exhausted the men-at-arms in their armor, and the English archers, protected by stakes, shot down the attackers before joining the melee.

How big were the armies at Agincourt?

The figures are disputed. A common estimate is about 6,000 English against 20,000 to 30,000 French; Anne Curry, working from the pay records, puts them at about 8,500 English against about 12,000 French.

Why did Henry V order the killing of French prisoners?

Late in the battle he was told that the French were attacking his baggage, and part of the French army seemed to be rallying for a new attack. Fearing that the prisoners would rejoin the fight, he ordered them killed.

How many died at Agincourt?

The French lost about 6,000 or more killed, many of them nobles, among them the Dukes of Alençon and Brabant. English deaths were a few hundred at most, including the Duke of York and the Earl of Suffolk.

What were the consequences of Agincourt?

It strengthened Henry V at home, weakened and divided the French nobility, and opened the way to the English conquest of Normandy and the Treaty of Troyes of 1420, which made Henry heir to the French throne.

Can you visit the Agincourt battlefield?

Yes. The Centre Azincourt 1415 in the village of Azincourt in the Pas-de-Calais has a museum on the campaign and the battle, and an observation tower looks out over the battlefield.

Battle honors of your homeland

The turning points of history

Marathon, Gaugamela, Cannae, Constantinople, Waterloo, Stalingrad: the days the world changed course.

Based on your country, which we do not store · why? ·

Loose the arrow storm yourself

Agincourt is one of 40 battles in Echoes of Battle, told scene by scene, with a real-time tactical mode in the works, and set on the ground where Henry V made his stand.